Taking the Long View
Instead of offering merely supplies to the people of postearthquake Haiti, what if we could offer our ingenuity?
Traditional Meets ModernIn looking at other postdisaster development, such as that in Pakistan after the earthquake in 2005, the international community learned that it is necessary to focus on improving traditional building technologies. These technologies are economically accessible to much of the population and rely on local, renewable resources. In the past 20 years, much research has been conducted on the performance of traditional materials such as earth, which is used extensively in Haiti’s housing in rural, peri-urban, and urban areas. Many buildings in Port-au-Prince and in the outlying rural areas are constructed partly or entirely of earth.
In order to develop guidelines or standards, Kleiwerks International has proposed to UN colleagues that the Co-laboratory should investigate traditional architectural styles that utilize materials other than cement. Their goals would be, first, to collect the data, and second, to come up with standards and best practices that combine the sensibility of the vernacular with the ingenuity of the modern to create aesthetically pleasing, climate-appropriate, economically viable, energy-efficient, and resilient housing, using locally available materials and techniques.
Modern Meets TraditionalASTM International is an international standards organization that develops and publishes voluntary consensus technical standards for a wide range of materials, products, systems, and services. It was recently updated in an effort led by the Ecological Building Network and its founder, Bruce King, who says, A number of great engineers around the world have worked out how to build seismically safe earthen buildings, really for the first time in history, and it seemed the best way to get that knowledge out was to develop and publish a recognized standard.” Now that ASTM International recognizes that earth is a measurable building material, the organizations concerned with rebuilding can share standards and best practices with builders in places such as Haiti, where it is a more practical choice than concrete, for example. Experienced practitioners of vernacular building techniques can teach owner-builders and contractors safe and affordable ways of using it to build, or to rebuild. With this kind of validation, government officials, and decision makers who have the power to distribute what funds have come through for rebuilding, can have more confidence in the official document if they don’t have technical knowledge or experience of building systems. That validation is referred to in the section of the standard on earthen construction:
Building Code Impact – Earthen building systems have historically not been engineered, but as of the late 20th century it is for the first time in history possible to reliably apply rational structural design methods to earthen construction. A large number of earthen building codes, guidelines and standards have appeared around the world over the past few decades, based upon a considerable amount of research and field observations regarding the seismic, thermal and moisture durability performance of earthen structures… This guide draws from those documents and the global experience to date in providing guidance on earthen construction to engineers, building officials, and regulatory agencies. (ASTM International, rev. 2010, p. 4)
One interesting discovery that structural engineers observe since the Haiti earthquake about the concrete buildings that failed is that while they should have been of high compressive strength, they were actually made of inferior material and were measured after the earthquake at very low compressive strength. And a lot of the earthen building materials, when tested, fell in at a lower strength ratio as well. To get around this insufficiency of compressive strength in earth, there are reinforcing technologies designed for earthen buildings that make it possible to use this weaker building material to create durable natural buildings. These reinforcing technologies, such as the use of bamboo for tensile strength, could be applied to weaker mixes of concrete in situations where rebar as reinforcement is too expensive. It should be possible to improve those poorly constructed concrete buildings without having to mimic what we have done in the developed world. Simply put, if you can use bamboo to reinforce an earthen building (this has been officially documented), you can also use bamboo to reinforce poor-quality concrete. This could be a temporary or a permanent solution, and with similar innovation, other materials than bamboo that are readily available in Haiti could be used in reinforcement. The innovation is to stop looking at concrete as a conventional building material and start looking at how the Haitians are really using it. And then to design solutions based on this use in the real world.
Developed Meets DevelopingThe Co-laboratory has designed an initial project that will take place over a period of six months. This project is divided into three phases and will identify and promote methods that
- adapt traditional architectural styles to modern solutions, using contemporary knowledge of vernacular materials and building methods;
- improve the durability of traditional structures made from local materials; and
- benefit local economies by improving homeowners’ and builders’ skills in providing safe, desirable housing.
The first phase will focus on studying traditional home construction in rural, peri-urban, and urban regions, where the building methods were based on local materials. There are many documented examples of such buildings using earth and stone. Some of the research is already being compiled by members of the Co-laboratory, who studied “gingerbread”-style houses in the urban area of the capital city, Port-au-Prince. (See “Blind Monks Examining an Elephant,” HE July/Aug ’10, p. 46.) This team of engineers, architects, and builders are conducting a project to preserve these historical buildings. The project is funded by the World Monuments Fund, the Prince Claus Fund, Foundation FOKAL, and UNESCO. The Co-laboratory hopes to broaden the assessment research beyond historical preservation to include some of the other 12 identified building styles that utilize earth in modern construction. This phase will culminate in a database of findings, which will be available to other organizations, and a preliminary report on those findings.
Phase 2: Technical Improvement
Through collaboration with national and international building trades experts, the team will begin to draft opportunities for improving local materials, based on recent international code specifications, including the ASTM International earthen building standard. This will mean doing a series of collaborative workshops, to take place in Haiti and with design teams and community representatives from sample communities, as well as ministry, UN, and partner nongovernmental organizations, all of whom will teach whatever they bring to the table. The Co-laboratory will conduct tests of traditional materials in conjunction with the Haitian National Materials Laboratory. At the end of this phase, the findings of the preliminary tests will be made public.
Phase 3: Dissemination
The workshops will culminate in the development of a summary containing best practices and standards for teaching builders best methods for combining traditional with modern materials. This phase, lasting about two months, will include the publication of a basic training manual and a series of workshops for architects, builders, and other stakeholders. This manual will be based on the findings and conclusions of the research. The trainings will be tailored to groups with the highest potential to adhere to, further disseminate, and perhaps even evolve the technical findings. The structure of reporting will be guided by UN-Habitat, which will facilitate that dialogue with the Haitian government concerning incorporation of the study findings into guidelines and best practices.
By working with Haitians up front and along the route, the Co-laboratory and other relief groups like it are learning from Haitians, who are bringing their understanding of the local customs, culture, and traditional building methods to the table, while the Co-laboratory brings its members’ knowledge of standards writing and engineering to bear on builders in Haiti, to achieve a true collaboration. It is worthwhile noting that female professionals will be included in each phase of the project to ensure that the results reflect the population as a whole and so lead to a more credible and realistic end product.
Following the conclusion of the project, there may be an opportunity to expand the materials and scope of the training by helping the trainers to improve their skills and by continuing to support local builders as projects get under way. The creation of standards and best practices in building could lead to a thriving culture of owner-builders, trades, and schools, and to an evolution of vernacular architecture, marrying what worked in the past with what is possible with modern building innovation. It’s an opportunity for the entire country to grow, and possibly a chance for developing nations to leapfrog over our mistakes in the developed world.
Kevin Rowell is program director for Kleiwerks International and owner of The Natural Builders, a licensed California contracting company (www.thenaturalbuilders.com). Leslie Jackson is associate editor of Home Energy.
For more information:
ASTM International. Standard Guide for Design of Earthen Wall Building Systems, E2392/E2392M – 10. ASTM, rev. May 2010.
For more information about the ASTM, and to read the full ASTM standard on earthen building, go to www.astm.org/Standards/E2392.htm.
To learn more about Kleiwerks International, go to www.kleiwerks.org.
To learn more about UN-Habitat, go to www.unhabitat.org.
To learn more about Ecological Building Network, go to www.ecobuildnetwork.org.
Enter your comments in the box below:
(Please note that all comments are subject to review prior to posting.)
While we will do our best to monitor all comments and blog posts for accuracy and relevancy, Home Energy is not responsible for content posted by our readers or third parties. Home Energy reserves the right to edit or remove comments or blog posts that do not meet our community guidelines.