New Development in Air Flow Measurements
September 01, 2005
A version of this article appears in the September/October 2005 issue of Home Energy Magazine.
Tracer gases have been used for many years for air flow testing in buildings. However, the expense and complexity of analysis equipment, and the difficulty of analyzing results, have restricted this kind of testing to research applications. For duct air flows, in particular, problems with getting uniform mixing and sampling also made tracer gas diagnostics unreliable. Recent research at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) has worked on addressing these problems—primarily to improve the measurement of air flows in commercial ducts. However, the techniques developed through this research can be applied just as usefully to measuring air handler flows in residential systems.
The LBNL study focused on using readily available inexpensive hardware to inject and sample tracer gas—usually CO2—without the problems of poor mixing and sampling that have previously plagued this technique.With these problems
resolved, and with the cost of high-accuracy CO2 analyzers dropping, tracer gas techniques are quickly becoming both cost-effective and reliable outside of the research environment.
The tracer gas measurement technique follows traditional pulse injection and sample integration methods. A pulse of tracer is released over a few seconds and the downstream concentration is integrated over time. A simple mass balance
equation is then used to determine the air flow. To ensure that the injected CO2 mixes effectively in the airstream, LBNL developed whip injectors. These injectors are very small, flexible tubes that emit the CO2 at high velocity by whipping around rapidly in the airstream, dispersing the tracer gas. Custom-built insertable fans with fold-up blades and
externally mounted motors are also used to help mix the tracer gas. Samples were taken using an irrigation system soaker hose installed across the duct. The multiple distributed holes in the soaker hose result in a more uniform sampling of the air flow.
A data logger and computer analyze the sample; the only data needed for the analysis is the total mass of the injected pulse of tracer gas. Total measurement time, including analysis, is only a few minutes. Containers of known quantities of tracer gas can be prepared ahead of time to avoid the need for expensive items, such as a precision weighing scale, and the always awkward transportation of large high-pressure gas cylinders.
The results of 32 laboratory tests measuring air flows in straight rectangular ducts, with and without a T-junction upstream of the measurement section, indicate that the uncertainty of the test procedure using these injection and sampling techniques is less than 2% (see Figure 1). The reference flow meter has a rated accuracy of 0.5%. This measurement procedure still needs to be tested in the residential sector to examine possible application issues, but the simplicity, relatively low cost, and insensitivity to upstream conditions mean that it has great potential.
Iain Walker is a researcher with the Indoor Environment Department at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the executive editor of Home Energy.
For more information: To learn more about the equipment and techniques described above, contact Craig Wray, mechanical engineer at LBNL, at email@example.com.
- FIRST PAGE
- PREVIOUS PAGE
© Home Energy Magazine 2018, all rights reserved. For permission to reprint, please send an e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Enter your comments in the box below:
(Please note that all comments are subject to review prior to posting.)
While we will do our best to monitor all comments and blog posts for accuracy and relevancy, Home Energy is not responsible for content posted by our readers or third parties. Home Energy reserves the right to edit or remove comments or blog posts that do not meet our community guidelines.