|
Better Breathing Thanks to Good Science
by Doug Garrett
Doug Garrett is principal of Building
Performance and Comfort, which is based in Leander, Texas.
About 15 years ago researchers started applying scientific
methods and instruments to the study of buildings. As a result,
over the last decade and a half, many cherished beliefs about
buildings and construction have been turned upside down. One
belief that I, as a product of the South, had a hard time
surrendering was the notion that there was no such thing as
an air conditioner that was too big.
Bigger is better is an American mantra and, when it came
to air conditioners, it was unquestioned wisdom. If a three-ton
air conditioner was good, a five-ton unit was better. Not
that we really knew what a ton of air conditioning was, but
we knew that we wanted as much of it as we could get.
Building science research has not only turned this assumption
upside down but also has revealed that following this mantra
can lead to serious health problems. The right size for an
air conditioner is the size that will cool your home on a
hot summer afternoon with only about 15% to spare. Why? We
found that when we install more air conditioning than this,
it will do what we call "short cycling." When the air conditioning
(A/C) unit is oversized, it can cool the house like it's doing
a part time job. It only runs for a few minutes--maybe five
or ten at a time--and then shuts down for a few minutes, before
starting up again. In these short cycles it cools the house,
but it does a very poor job of removing humidity.
Usually as an A/C cools the hot air in a home, moisture condenses
out of the air and gets discharged into the condensate line,
because cooler air can not hold as much moisture as warmer
air does. But an A/C doesnˆt get cold enough to remove water
until it has run for three to five minutes. It also canˆt
pull enough indoor air through the unit to wring out the water
during such short run times. So homeowners get the "cave effect"
in which a home is cool, but damp feeling. The excess moisture
that builds up in the house encourages mold and dust mites
to reproduce like madònot a good situation for the occupants.
In
my work as a home performance specialist, I see a fair number
of people who get sick unknowingly from just such a problem.
One day I received a call from a woman who complained that
her home smelled like "a boys' locker room on Friday afternoon."
She also told me that their grandson got sick every time he
stayed with them and left coughing with a runny nose. She
too had begun to have allergies all the time. I asked about
the air conditioning and was told that it was fine. They had
just replaced it during the previous winter with a new high
efficiency one.
I got to the house and found that her nose was quite accurate.
The house had a pungent odor that was very reminiscent of
old sneakers. The humidity in the home was around 68% and
they were keeping the house at a cool 71 degrees. I still
found the house uncomfortable as I am not one who enjoys experiencing
relative humidity levels of more than 55%.
I checked the home for obvious sources of moistureòaquariums,
lots of plants, or a steam roomòbut found none. I also looked
for filter marks in the doorways, any big exhaust fans, or
other indications that the house experienced pressure swings
and found nothing. My pressure testing told me that the house
was operating at a negative pressure of 3.9 Pascals, a sure
sign that the air conditioning ducts were leaking pretty badly.
Even with the bad duct leaks, the owners told me that the
new A/C unit only ran for five or ten minutes each time it
came on during the hottest part of the afternoon. I then went
out to see what the ground looked like where the A/C unit's
condensate line exited the home. The soil was a little damp,
but there was nothing like the amount of water coming out
of that line that one should see in a home like this. These
signs began to add up to a familiar picture.
At the urging of all the A/C contractors they had talked
with, these homeowners had replaced their old three-ton unit
with a new four-ton A/C system. They had gotten a bigger unit
because when they told the A/C contractors that the old unit
sometimes didnˆt keep the house comfortable, the solution
they all immediately offered was more tonnage. Because "bigger
is better"is the standard response to any complaint, I was
not surprised to hear this. I knew from experience that a
home of only 1,540 square feet that was built in the early
ˆ90s didnˆt need a four-ton unit. I also knew that the ducts
were leaking very badly and that if they had been fixed, the
old system would have been able to cool the home just fine.
When
the new unit, which was oversized by 1.5 to 2.0 tons, ran
in its very short cycles through the leaky ducts, it did not
stand a chance of properly dehumidifying the house. The resulting
high indoor humidity levels created a perfect incubator for
molds. The house had a good crop behind the vinyl wallpaper
in the kitchen, in both bathrooms, and under the paneling
in the living room.
To fix their problems, I got the leaky ducts sealed up, downsized
the system to a 2.5-ton system, and remediated the mold. (I
told them a 2.0-ton unit would do the job, but that was too
much change too fast for them.) All was well, and both the
old and young folks stopped their constant coughing and sneezing.
Like many home performance problems, we needed to address
the system, not just one item, to get the desired outcome.
So how do you assure that your air conditioner is properly
sized? Sizing an air conditioner should be done according
to the Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA) Manual
J, Sizing Calculation Methodology. If you ask a contractor
to install an air conditioning unit sized to ACCA Manual J
and you get a blank stare, move on to another contractor.
The new unit will probably be smaller, but will do a better
job of cooling and dehumidifying your home at less cost. ACCA,
the contractors own association, admits that the average air
conditioner in this country is from 150% to 200% as big as
it really needs to be.
|