|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |

Home Energy Magazine Online September/October 1998
TRENDS
Hot Water Improvements Top Warm Climate Weatherization
Measures
 |
| Low-flow showerheads got the highest savings-to-investment rating
in the study, but that category was given a low confidence rating. More
studies are needed. |
Reducing hot water costs is the most cost-effective
way to save money for low-income housing in warm climates. This is one
conclusion that can be drawn from a new study on the cost-effectiveness
of energy-saving measures for low-income housing in warm climates. The
study brings together the findings of existing reports in order to estimate
the cost-effectiveness of various low-income weatherization measures.
Energy conservation measures for warm climates
may differ from those for cold climates because they must not only reduce
conduction of heat between the outside and the inside of the house, but
also reduce the effects of the sun. In cold weather, the heat from the
sun helps cut energy costs, but in hot climates, it adds to the cooling
bill.
The researchers from Oak
Ridge National Laboratory, Mike Gettings and Michaela Martin, examined
eight categories of warm-climate energy-saving measures: cooling and heating
equipment, hot water, insulation, ventilation and infiltration, lighting,
solar load, window and door replacement, and appliances. The comprehensive
chart (see below) cites the average first-year savings,
installation cost, savings-to-investment ratio (SIR), and maintenance requirements
for each measure. The study also examines how sensitive each measure is
to customer interactions, customer education, climate, building characteristics,
and number of occupants. Confidence level ratings in the report reflect
the degree of certainty, quality, and variability of information used to
determine the SIRs, as seen in the literature.
Measures that reduced hot water use got the highest
SIR rankings, mainly because of their universal application in all climates
and their relatively low cost. Hot water accounts for 20%Ð40% of the
energy consumed by low-income homes in warm weather climates. Most of the
18 water heating measures that were examined are well established as techniques
for reducing water-heating energy consumption. Installation of water tank
insulation and flow restrictors in homes with electric water heaters saved
the most money compared to the installation cost. Tank insulation can be
installed for about $25, and it saved from $10 to $38 per year. Low-flow
showerheads cost only $30 and saved $27 per year. Other high-SIR measures
in the hot-water category included heat traps on electric hot water tanks,
gas-fired water heater tank insulation, and temperature setbacks on electric
water heaters. On electric tanks, heat traps saved $17 per year and cost
about $30 to install. Insulating gas-fired tanks saved from $3 to $10 per
year and cost about $25. Depending on the existing water heater temperature
setting, reducing the setting cost virtually nothing yet saved from $10
to $17 for electric water heaters. The finding that water-heater efficiency
improvements save the most money compared to installation costs supports
what is commonly practiced in the field.
On the other end of the SIR rating scale, one
of the lowest-ranking measures was forced attic ventilation using a solar
powered fan. Savings were small ($2Ð$3 per year), while the measure
cost $800 to implement. Other low-ranking measures included foundation
insulation for slab-on-grade (a measure that is far more cost-effective
in cold-climates), gas tankless water heaters, reflective roofing in already
insulated attics, and refrigerator tune-up (unless performed by the homeowner).
Several envelope measures ranked low, but they were examined for their
effects on cooling only. They would be more effective in climates with
significant heating requirements. These measures included adding wall insulation
and increasing the attic insulation level from R-19 to R-30.
Russell Clark, who works in low-income weatherization
with the Department of Commerce Energy Office in Arizona, says he will
use the report's findings to compare costs of weatherization measures done
in states where cooling measures are more important. "Costs are an obviously
sensitive parameter and can significantly change the SIR value," says Clark.
Review of Water, Lighting, and Cooling Energy
Efficiency Measures for Low-Income Homes Located in Warm Climates is
available to the public from the National Technical Information Service,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield VA 22161.
-Deborah Rider Allen
Deborah Rider Allen is a freelance writer
in Richmond, Virginia.
Publication of this article was supported
by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of State and Community Programs,
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
| Weatherization Measures with High Confidence Ratings |
| Measure |
1st year savings (kWh or Mbtu) |
1st year savings ($) |
Installation Cost ($) |
SIR (*=cooling only) |
| Electric Hot Water Measures |
| Heat traps on tank |
210 kWh |
$17 |
$30 |
5.7 |
| Tank insulation |
130Ð480 kWh |
$10Ð$38 |
$25 |
4Ð15 |
| Temperature setback |
130Ð210 kWh |
$10Ð$17 |
$0 |
High |
| Electric tankless water heater |
320Ð790 kWh |
$25Ð$63 |
$800 |
0.32Ð0.8 |
| Small solar water heater |
2,000 kWh |
$170 |
$1,100 |
2.2 |
| Large solar water heater |
1,800Ð3,000 kWh |
$140Ð$240 |
$2,500 |
0.79Ð1.3 |
| Gas Hot Water Measures |
| Heat traps on tank |
0.72 Mbtu |
$5 |
$30 |
0.57 |
| Tank insulation |
0.43Ð1.6 Mbtu |
$3Ð$10 |
$25 |
1.4Ð4.6 |
| Temperature setback |
0.43Ð0.72 Mbtu |
$3Ð$4 |
$0 |
High |
| Gas tankless water heater |
1.1Ð2.7 Mbtu |
$7Ð$17 |
$1,174 |
0.07Ð0.17 |
| Cooling and Heating Equipment Measures |
| Air conditioner tune-up |
90Ð790 kWh |
$7Ð$64 |
$80 |
0.20Ð1.4* |
| Window air conditioner replacement |
100Ð890 kWh |
$8Ð$71 |
$600 |
0.15Ð1.3* |
| Central air-conditioner replacement |
100Ð890 kWh |
$8Ð$71 |
$1,500 |
0.06Ð0.77* |
| Evaporative cooler installation |
960 kWh |
$77 |
$1,000 |
0.72* |
| Duct sealing |
60Ð500 kWh |
$4Ð$40 |
$200 |
0.16Ð1.63* |
| Lighting Measures |
| Replacement of 5 or 6 lamps |
220Ð320 kWh |
$18Ð$26 |
$90Ð$110 |
1.2Ð1.4 |
| Insulation Measures |
| Add attic insulation (R-19 to R-30) |
40Ð110 kWh |
$3Ð$9 |
$400 |
0.12Ð0.33* |
| Foundation insulation (basement) |
190 kWh |
$15 |
$640 |
0.38* |
| Foundation insulation (crawl space) |
200 kWh |
$16 |
$600 |
0.45 |
| Foundation insulation (slab-on-grade) |
70Ð240 kWh |
$5Ð$20 |
$1,700 |
0.05Ð0.19 |
| Wall insulation in wood frame walls with attic insulation |
35Ð360 kWh |
$3Ð$29 |
$1,200 |
0.04Ð0.40* |
| Wall insulation of masonry walls with attic insulation |
35Ð360 kWh |
$3Ð$29 |
$4,900 |
0Ð0.09* |
| Ventilation Measures |
| Passive attic ventilation |
10Ð85 kWh |
$1Ð$6 |
$50 |
0.22Ð1.4 |
| Mechanical solar-powered attic ventilation |
2Ð170 kWh |
$2Ð$13 |
$800 |
0.02Ð0.13 |
| Skirting of mobile homes heated by gas or heat pumps |
24Ð480 kWh |
$1Ð$39 |
$300 |
0.03Ð0.77 |
| Skirting mobile homes heated by electric resistance heat |
45Ð920 kWh |
$4Ð$73 |
$300 |
0.07Ð1.47 |
| Whole-house fan installation |
50Ð330 kWh |
$4Ð$26 |
$200 |
0.17Ð1.1 |
| Solar Load Reduction Measures |
| Full-year solar screens and films |
|
$0Ð$10 per unit |
$37 per unit |
0Ð2.0 |
| Summer-only solar screens and films |
|
$4Ð$10 per unit |
$37 per unit |
0.6Ð2.2 |
| Radiant barriers with R-11 attic insulation |
not available |
not available |
$360 |
0.51Ð0.86 |
| Radiant barriers with R-30 attic insulation |
not available |
not available |
$360 |
0.15Ð0.31 |
| Awnings |
|
$2Ð$37 |
$90 per unit |
0Ð0.7 |
| The U.S. Department of Energy recently collected extensive
information on the cost-effectiveness of various efficiency measures for
low-income homes in warm climates. This table shows some of the findings
that were given high confidence ratings. The most reliable savings arise
from measures that reduce water-heating energy use. |
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice

|