|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
Home Energy Magazine Online May/June 1998
EDITORIAL
Why Solar Roofs?
 |
| Executive editor Alan Meier's appreciation for solar
gets dampened by El Nino. |
One element of President Clinton's climate change
program is installing one million solar collectors on the roofs of American
homes. Both photovoltaic (PV) and water-heating units are included in the
plan, although pool heaters are excluded. It's easy to criticize the program
(and we will in a moment), but several aspects deserve commendation.
First, encouraging the use of renewable-energy
technologies should be part of any attempt to mitigate climate change.
The technologies to wean us from fossil fuels need to be stimulated both
by increasing the price of fossil fuels and reducing the cost of the solar
alternatives. The administration's policies are consistent with that long-range
strategy.
Moreover, the administration plans to invest
a lot of effort (and presumably money) in builder education programs, creating
standard specifications for solar units, tax credits, and government procurement
of units for applications where they are most economical. These actions
will help establish a market and the expertise to service it. With luck,
those carefully trained contractors will avoid converting perfectly good
roofs into leaky solar roofs.
Unfortunately, the economics of photovoltaic
systems are currently dismal. The Department of Energy admits that PV-generated
electricity now costs about 24¢/kWh but hopes that these programs
will cut that cost. There is probably some truth to this expectation, but
the government is wisely hedging its bets by installing solar where electricity
is expensive. The National Park Service, for example, installs PV only
if they would otherwise need to build costly utility lines to remote locations.
The administration has different plans for individual consumers. Clinton
plans to subsidize residential PV installations even if simple economics
do not recommend them.
It is foolish to generate very expensive electricity
in order to power inefficient appliances. If the administration wants to
pay a premium to develop new solar generating capacity, it also needs to
ensure that energy is used as efficiently as possible. This means further
improvements in everything from lights to refrigerators. Clinton has proposed
an increase in the conservation budget, but no programs comparable to the
solar roofs. For example, rapid deployment of heat pump water heaters to
all-electric homes with high hot-water demand and expensive electricity
would save far more electricity per installation than PV units, at a fraction
of the cost.
We're glad the administration has mapped out
a solar strategy. But energy efficiency can achieve more CO2
savings at less cost. Too bad high-efficiency windows and basement heat
pumps don't have the catchy slogan, or the visibility, of a million solar
roofs.
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|