|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
Home Energy Magazine Online January/February 1998
TRENDS
Regulating Ventless Heaters
 |
| Code authorities are struggling to decide whether the oxygen depletion
sensor on vent-free heaters like this one is enough to prevent indoor air
quality problems. |
Ventless gas heaters have seen sales take off over
the past few years, buoyed by their low cost, attractive design, and high
efficiency. Meanwhile, building scientists working on indoor air quality
and building durability have warned that these heaters can produce enough
combustion products to make occupants sick, while also degrading building
structures. Recently, the controversy has moved to regulatory bodies in
New York and California, and to a subcommittee within International Approval
Services (IAS), home of the vaunted ANSI (American National Standards Institute)
Standards.
The gas industry defends unvented heaters, pointing
out that they are allowed by 42 state building codes in the United States,
and that they are widely used in Europe. Mike Calderrera of the Gas Appliance
Manufacturers Association says the heaters have safety measures intended
to guard against dangerous combustion products. "Every heater since 1980
has been required to have an oxygen depletion sensor (ODS)," Calderrera
says. "This has certainly improved safety. Today's products are built to
satisfy all the requirements of the ANSI safety standard." Ken Maitland,
director of engineering at the California-based gas appliance maker Fireplace
Manufacturers Incorporated (FMI), says, "I believe as an engineer that
they're safe, if designed correctly and the ODS is installed."
The safety features are widely proclaimed by
the Vent-Free Alliance (VFA), a coalition of members of the Gas Appliance
Manufacturers Association. Nice & Warm, a booklet published
by the VFA, says that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) data
"show no documented deaths due to emissions associated with the use of
an ODS-equipped vent-free gas heating appliance" since 1980.
Sandy Weisner of Medford, Oregon, is not soothed
by these assurances. She installed an FMI ventless heater in 1996, and
soon after developed symptoms of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. She installed
a CO alarm, which sounded as soon as she used her unvented fireplace. She
went to the doctor and found that the levels of carbon monoxide in her
blood were 30 times normal concentrations. She has since been lobbying
her state's code bodies to ban the heaters.
Many building scientists are harshly critical
of the gas industry's safety claims. While every brochure, video, and Web
site about unvented heaters relates their safety to the ODS, Greg Traynor,
formerly an indoor air quality researcher at Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, says there is almost no correlation between oxygen depletion
and increased pollutant concentrations. "There's no way you're ever going
to get the ODS to go off unless you have a way oversized heater in a tiny
room," he says.
In a 1983 Department of Energy study, Traynor
and six other researchers, including Mike Apte (author of "Unvented
Heaters: Drainless Sinks?" HE, Sept/Oct '96, p. 9) found that
the heaters "pose a potential threat to the health of occupants of houses
where such appliances are used."
Meanwhile, a new study from the University of
Connecticut reports that CO can cause permanent brain damage without any
single traumatic poisoning.
Oregon, however, is like most other states where
the devices are allowed. Legislatures and code officials are reluctant
to outlaw the vent-free heaters, for lack of conclusive evidence that they
are harmful. As of March 1996, only eight states and eight Canadian provinces
prohibited the appliances, and codes are steadily becoming more accommodating.
The Tide Turning?
Today, unvented heaters are being carefully scrutinized
in California and New York. After contentious legislative battles in those
states, both states' health officials are seeking reliable sizing guidelines.
They hope that by sizing the heaters correctly for the amount of ventilation
in a house and for the local climate, they can keep the heaters from hurting
anyone.
With these developments on the horizon, in March,
1996, the Gas Research Institute (GRI) released what it hoped would be
universally acceptable sizing guidelines. In 1997, the GRI guidelines were
nominated for incorporation into the ANSI national safety standard for
unvented gas heaters, Z21.11.2. These proposed guidelines have turned into
a lightning rod for criticism.
The GRI guideline has been criticized for flawed
assumptions and weak science. For example, one indoor air quality researcher
with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) says, "The report assumes
that a loose house has one air change per hour (ACH), while a tight house
has 0.35 ACH. But 0.35 ACH is probably about average for the good new houses
being built in California today, and we often see houses much tighter than
this."
Tom Greiner (author of "The
Case of the CO Leak: Solving the Mysteries of Carbon Monoxide Exposure,"
HE Nov/Dec '97, p. 21) adds, "No attention whatever is paid to a
'worst-case' or even a less than favorable [ventilation] scenario." The
gas industry traditionally uses worst-case scenarios, and then adds additional
safety factors when designing equipment or developing standards. Greiner
also criticizes the GRI assumption that the heaters will be used at most
four hours at a time. He cites a homeowner who uses an unvented heater
all the time, but calls it "a supplemental heater because it heats only
part of the house."
Ken Giles of the Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC) agrees. "In the burn belt of the South," he says, "unvented heaters
have traditionally been used as primary heat for many homes without central
heaters." The CPSC recommends that indoor heaters not be used while residents
are asleep, and produces safety brochures encouraging homeowners to use
CO alarms.
The New York State Research and Development Authority
(NYSERDA) produced a peer-reviewed critique of the GRI standard. Among
other things, it criticizes the GRI's indoor air quality guideline of 0.5
ppm (parts per million) for nitrogen dioxide. "No international, federal,
or state guidelines that have been adopted are as high as 0.5 ppm. If an
air quality guideline of 0.25 ppm is used for nitrogen dioxide, air quality
will quickly reach unacceptable levels for homes" in climates with more
than 2,000 heating degree-days. Some such climates include mild Santa Barbara,
California; St. Louis, Missouri; and Washington, D.C.
The NYSERDA report also criticized the GRI's
science. "The heater sizes recommended," it says, "are larger than the
heater sizes which were used to calculate indoor air contaminant levels."
Potential moisture problems are cited by Stuart
Brooks, an architect with Energy Design Associates Incorporated of Eagle
River, Alaska. In his eight years at the Alaska Energy Programs Office
and since then in private practice, he has encountered several unvented
heaters. "They do create a large condensation problem for houses here in
the Anchorage area, as well as carbon shadowing on walls and ceilings,"
he says (see "Black Stains in Houses: Soot, Dust,
or Ghosts," p. 15). While the Vent-Free Alliance's video Vent-Free
IAQ Research states that a humidity level of 60% is desirable, Brooks
says that in very cold weather, "more than 40% continuous relative humidity
is almost a surefire level of condensation problems. Icing on windows,
not just condensation, becomes a problem."
It is too early to tell whether criticisms of
the proposed ANSI standard will affect California's and New York's sizing
guidelines. But regardless of what guidelines eventually prevail, one source
familiar with California's indoor air quality politics points out, "It's
dubious whether sizing standards could be enforced." After all, the heaters
are sold as do-it-yourself retrofits at large retailers nationwide. When
customers buy and install their units, they may use whatever size they
feel fits their needs.
Crisis or Annoyance?
For all the problems, there is no epidemic of deaths
caused by unvented heaters. Even a harsh critic at CARB says the current
standards, combined with the ODS, are likely to prevent fatalities. The
Vent-Free Alliance claims that such heaters have caused no fatalities since
the ODS was first required in the early 1980s.
The Consumer Products Safety Commission logged
over 15 CO poisoning events, including 10 fatalities, from unvented gas
heaters between December 1994 and January 1997. Some of the poisonings
were clearly caused by new heaters, but it is unclear whether the fatalities
were caused by pre-ODS heaters.
Some manufacturers have experimented with including
CO detectors with their unvented heaters, but this is not even being considered
as part of the revision to the ANSI standard.
Weisner still suffers from reduced stamina and
dizziness that were not present before her poisoning. However, because
she was not seriously disabled, she has been unable to find an attorney
willing to sue FMI. They think the prospective award would be too small
to pay the necessary expert witnesses. But with millions of unvented heaters
now installed nationwide, she feels it's only a matter of time before more
people are poisoned. "It could have been my grandchildren," she adds.
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|