|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
EREN
Home Page |
Home Energy Magazine Online November/December 1996
TRENDS
Landlords Invest
in Rental Partnership
Technical supervisor John Quimby discusses a new duct
run with Tom Andrews. The Kansas City program installs everything from
air sealing to new furnaces, requiring careful planning for each job. |
Advocates of energy efficiency all lament the
split incentive that discourages conservation investments in rental housing.
Owners don't directly enjoy the savings or comfort, and transient tenants
don't know if they'll be around long enough to collect the return on investment.
Meanwhile, wasted dollars and heat continue to fly out the windows. In
low-income multifamily housing, high tenant turnover, poor building maintenance,
and an all-around lack of cash put efficiency investments even lower on
most people's priority lists.
The Kansas City Department of Housing and Community
Development (KCDHCD) in Missouri has found a way past this standoff. KCDHCD
combines federal and state grants with a modest landlord investment to
weatherize private multifamily rentals for low-income tenants. The Home
Weatherization Rental Partnership Program began with a pilot program in
which landlords contributed only 10% of the costs of installed conservation
measures. It is now an ongoing program weatherizing 50 to 100 units per
year, and the owner contribution has risen to a still-low 25%.
Administrators expect to increase the landlord
contribution again, now that landlords understand the value of the program's
services.
In addition to the owner's contribution, the
program gets funding from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Missouri's
Department of Natural Resources. KCDHCD's contract with the landlord prohibits
raising rents specifically to recover the owner's cost of participation.
The 1992 pilot involved 25 units in several 6-unit
buildings owned by a single landlord. The average per-unit cost for all
work in the pilot was $1,475. Of this, nearly $1,000 was for air sealing,
about $275 for insulation, and about $200 for furnace analysis and repairs.
A weather-adjusted comparison of gas bills for the pilot units found that
the weatherization saved an average 36% on heating-season gas, worth $88
per apartment at local prices. Blower door tests showed average leakage
at 50 Pascals (Pa) dropped by 47%.
Despite the modest savings, program administrator
Robert T. Jackson calls the pilot program a "resounding success." In addition
to energy savings, he points out that on more than one third of the furnaces,
contractors found and repaired potentially dangerous leaks of natural gas
or combustion products.
KCDHCD recruits landlords by mailing four-page
program descriptions and application forms to all multifamily property
owners in the city. The tenants must complete the applications, usually
at the request of the owner. The mailings result in one or two requests
from landlords per week.
If the tenants qualify for DOE low-income weatherization
funds, the city provides a free estimate of how much work they believe
they'll need to do. In general, the program focuses most on insulation,
because it tends to lower fuel bills most dramatically. More than 80% of
landlords decide to get the work done. The city government then hires contractors
to perform the work.
If some, but not all, of the tenants in a building
qualify, the program tries to find funds to work on the whole building-either
the funds allocated for the low-income tenants are spread out and used
for all tenants; landlords promise to move low-income tenants into vacant
apartments, increasing the allocation; or landlords pay the entire cost
of weatherizing nonqualifying apartments.
KCDHCD uses the National Energy Audit (NEAT)
software, but it is limited in its usefulness for buildings with six or
more units. They found EA-QUIP, developed by the State of New York, to
be more useful, but have not yet put it into wide-scale use (see "Computerized
Energy Audits," HE May/June '94, p. 27).
Program administrators also learned that good
communication among program managers, auditors, contractors, tenants, and
owners helps to prevent conflicts on the job site. Getting the applications
filled out properly requires cooperation between landlords and tenants,
who are not always on the best of terms.
For more information on the program, call Robert
T. Jackson or John Quimby at (816)274-2201.
Richard Engel is a freelance writer based
in San Francisco, California.
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
EREN
Home Page |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|