|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
EREN Home Page |
Home Energy Magazine Online November/December 1996
LETTERS
"Accurate" Is an Eight-Letter Word
In "'Off' Is a Three-Letter
Word" (July/Aug '96, p. 42), the table of phantom loads reports findings
from the author's test device with 3 and 4 significant figures, when at
best the rig is good to +/- 2%.
The extreme readings are particularly suspect.
How did he measure a 13-watt load with a 1,000 ohm shunt? The measurement
equipment itself would affect the measurement. A high resistance shunt
gives you high gain, but it introduces a significant voltage drop when
the current is high. The tester should actually use shunts of different
values with different loads-a high resistance shunt for small loads, and
a lower resistance shunt for high loads.
It's true that a rig like this would be useful
for telling if an appliance leaks significantly or not. But it shouldn't
be used for making detailed measurements.
Leo Rainer
Davis Energy Group
Davis, CA
Editor's reply: You're right, the significant
figures are excessive. The accuracy of the meter warrants two to three
figures, but the accuracy of the technique (using current as a proxy for
power) is good to only one digit, given that the power factor can vary
by a factor of four or more with these loads. And yes, the loads of more
than a few watts have extra uncertainty without using a lower-resistance
shunt. (Also, note editing errors for the personal computers AST 286 and
generic 386 CPU, and the TI 865 printer. All should have negligible yearly
kWh.)
Who's Using All the Hot Water?
The average hot water usage per day given in "Try
These On for Size: New Guidelines for Multifamily Water Heating" (HE
Jul/Aug '96, p.34, Table 2)-14, 30,
and 54 gallons per person for low, medium, and high usage categories-seems
very different from the assumptions used to calculate the yearly water
heating costs on federal EnergyGuide labels. The EnergyGuide labels assume
64.3 gallons per household per day, a figure that is also used for standard
tests for Energy Factor. Many researchers feel that this number is higher
than the actual average usage. Mr. Goldner's table suggests the average
household in a multifamily building uses much more than that (a family
of four at medium usage would use 120 gallons per day). Any explanation?
Jonathan Beers
Madison Gas & Electric
Madison, WI
Author Fred Goldner responds: My numbers come
from field monitoring of multifamily buildings around the country. As much
as I might wish the results were lower, they are based on real time measurements.
Multifamily tenants might use more water than single-family homes because
tenants often do not directly pay for water, or the fuel to heat the water,
based on how much they use. When apartment buildings are submetered for
electricity, usage typically drops by 20%-30%; the effect of submetering
water use would probably be similar. Another major contributor to the high
usage in apartments is leaks. Leaks are much more likely to be fixed in
single-family homes, where the homeowner pays the water bills and is responsible
for the maintenance. In multifamily buildings, leaks can go for long periods
of time undetected or unreported (including leaks into the basement or
the boiler, as well as potentially large numbers of dripping or running
faucets). Remember that a 2 1/2 drop per second drip will use about 500
gallons per month.
Of course there is tremendous variability
in usage even within categories like single family or multifamily. This
is what prompted us to develop a range of usage factors (whose selection
is based on demographic and building characteristics) for the ASHRAE sizing
guidelines, instead of using one standard average value for every case.
Fiberglass Ups Its R-Value
I want to compliment you on the extremely fair and
balanced article on insulation ("Home Energy's
Consumer Guide to Insulation," Sept/Oct '96, p. 21). One minor point:
on page 23, the figures on R-value in sidewalls are not up to date. With
both fiberglass batts and BIBS (blown-in-blanket system), you can get R-15
in 2 x 4 construction. Plus, I believe cellulose claims R-14. In 2 x 6
construction, fiberglass batts are available at R-21, and you can get R-23
with BIBS. Therefore the chart on page 24 is also incorrect.
Thomas A. Newton
CertainTeed
Valley Forge, PA
Only Soggy Ceilings Sag
I thoroughly enjoy receiving Home Energy.
Along with Energy Design Update and Environmental Building News,
it helps me stay abreast of new products, applications, and industry developments.
Each has its own perspective. Thank you for a job well done.
On page 26 of the "Consumer Guide to Insulation,"
you discuss weight and density with regard to the potential for ceiling
sags. You correctly say that: (1) 1/2-inch drywall 24 inches on-center
contributes to the potential, (2) such is a rare combination, and (3) if
using either 5/8-inch drywall or framing 16-inches on center, there should
be no problem.
United States Gypsum Company (USG) identifies
excess moisture as the major cause of objectionable ceiling sags. Fiberglass
manufacturers have taken portions of USG's Gypsum Construction Handbook
out of context when promoting their lighter density loose-fill insulations.
You were correct as far as you wrote. Perhaps next time you can go a little
further to dispel the myth that rock wool and cellulose at R-38 and above
causes ceilings to sag.
Bob Sullivan
Rock Wool Manufacturing
Leeds, AL
Editor's note: The Gypsum Construction
Handbook is available from USG, Department 147-4 Handbook, P.O. Box
806258, Chicago, IL 60680-4124.
Forgotten Films
I have to tell you how disappointed I was that your
article on cooling savings ("What Drives Cooling
Savings in Mobile Homes," July/Aug '96, p. 21) did not even mention
the possibility of solar control window films as a solution to excessive
heat gain. Since window film is both very affordable and a noninvasive
retrofit product, you certainly dropped the ball on providing your readers
with comprehensive information on dealing with these problems.
Virginia L. Kubler
Courtaulds Performance Films
Martinsville, VA
Editor's reply: We didn't mean to give window
films short shrift. Window films are indeed another good way to reduce
solar heat gain, and are much less expensive than replacing the window.
New high quality window films-and even a low-e window film-are much more
permanent and effective than the older products that tended to peel off
and significantly reduced visible light transmission.
Progress?
Unfortunately we were unable to attend the Building
Energy conference in Boston in March. However, it was interesting to read
about Mark Kelley's remarks in "Building Energy:
A Meeting of Minds" (July/Aug '96, p. 9). The article said, "When houses
are constructed well, they can often get by with heating system capacities
of 25,000 Btu/h ..."
The 1977 Leger House in Pepperell, Massachusetts,
demonstrated that a well-built house performed well with a Japanese Paloma
natural gas instantaneous hot water heater, and fourteen feet of baseboard.
Annual heating bill: $38.50.
The 4,000 square foot New Ipswich, Massachusetts,
Leger House also demonstrated that a single point source of heat, an Austrian
tiled wood stove, keeps the entire structure at a constant temperature,
room to room, ceiling to floor, without duct work or fans. I often wonder
if we have made any progress since 1977.
Gene Leger
Leger Designs
New Boston, NH
Ventilate Right,
Then Build Tight
Retrofitters are still following the seriously flawed
standard of "Just tight enough to be safe." There's no such thing! Leaks
are not the correct way to supply air to people, to combustion appliances,
or to ventilating fans. In spring and fall, when there is little energy
penalty in providing plenty of fresh air to the indoors, leaks provide
very little fresh air. In cold weather, when the energy penalty is high,
they provide way too much "fresh" air, and we have a simultaneous energy
and comfort problem.
In 1978, the clever Swede Thomas Lindvall said,
"Ventilate Right, then Build Tight." He was right then, he
is right now, and he will be right in the future. There is some room for
variation in what is "Right," but the sequence of "ventilation then air
tightening" is vital. We should install balanced ventilation systems, or
at least ventilation that cannot cause significant depressurization, and
then tighten every leak we can find. This will give us better indoor climates
at lower energy costs, and better comfort as well.
As long as we recommend tightening "just enough"
to avoid problems, we are setting ourselves up for serious failures over
time. The lawyers will have a heyday, Americans will get sick and lose
money, and energy conservation will get another black eye.
Jim H. White
Senior Advisor, Building Science
Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation
Ottawa, ON
Built Tight, Now Ventilating Right
I purchased a home that is pretty tight. There are
about 20 inches of fiberglass batt insulation in the attic. The walls are
2 x 6 and the entire structure is wrapped with Tyvek. But the builder made
no accommodations for ventilation!
I recently purchased a vent fan with a heat exchanger.
I intend to create positive indoor pressure by using this fan to force
fresh air into the house. When it is cold enough outside, the heat exchanger
would be fed by a heat storage tank. (A heat pump-heat storage system is
part of the HVAC system.) I plan to exhaust through existing vents in the
bathroom and kitchen and through new ones in some bedrooms.
The HVAC system was well designed and built.
The return ducts and vents are twice the size of the supply, all ductwork
is formed fiberglass with foil backing, and all is sealed very well with
caulk.
I am concerned about humidity (or lack thereof)
in the winter. Is my plan sound? How can I test?
Jon Geissinger
Elliottsburg, PA
Editor's Reply: According to ventilation consultant
Don Stevens, your idea of using a small central vent fan to help ventilate
your house is a good one. If you lived in a hot climate and used air conditioning,
positive pressure might help minimize condensation in the walls of your
home. However, since you live in a cold climate, positive pressure may
cause condensation as warm, humid household air is forced out through small
cracks. (Yes, virtually all houses leak somewhere!) To find out whether
your space is pressurized, hold a smoke stick or a tissue over the crack
of a barely open door and see if air is flowing in or out of the space.
Stevens suggests that you wire one or more
exhaust fans to go on whenever your central vent fan operates. So long
as the two are on the same circuit, you can wire the central vent fan in
parallel to a bath fan switch. That way, the bath fan can be turned on
when needed, and will also go on whenever the central fan goes on. If you
discharge the central vent fan into the furnace ductwork, you can use the
furnace ducts to distribute the fresh air.
Pick the exhaust fans by combining the rated
flows to approximately match the flow of the central vent fan. A reasonably
balanced flow of outdoor air and exhausted stale air will minimize the
potential for condensation and eventual structural damage. Total ventilation
flow should be about 15 cubic feet per minute (CFM) plus an additional
15 CFM per bedroom.
Stevens suggests that you operate your ventilation
system at least eight hours a day. ASHRAE recommends supplying outdoor
air and exhausting stale air whenever the house is occupied, just as is
done for commercial buildings. If your bath fans are too noisy to operate
this long, you might look at the quiet fan list in Stevens' article "Mechanical
Ventilation for the Home" (HE March/April '96, p. 13). The effect on
humidity depends on the climate. If the winter air is cold and dry, the
air you bring in will absorb a tremendous amount of household moisture,
and overventilation will cause household humidity levels to be too low.
| Back to Contents Page
|
Home Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
EREN Home Page |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|