|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
EREN Home Page |
Home Energy Magazine Online September/October 1996
Putting Pressure on Building Codes
by David Brook
David Brook is an extension agent with the
Oregon State University Extension Service. He recently introduced an amendment
to the Oregon State Code to require a worst-case depressurization test.
House depressurization is a ubiquitous, dangerous
problem. As regional mechanical codes move toward consolidation into one
International Mechanical Code, now is the time to add a performance testing
requirement for house depressurization.
Negative house pressures can cause a variety of dangerous
situations including flame roll-out. Worst-case pressure testing can help
assess whether a house has depressurization problems, thus allowing contractors
to correct pressure imbalances. |
Last winter, in Oregon's
Willamette Valley, a family was spending their first season in a new custom
colonial-style house. After enjoying a fire one evening in their living
room fireplace with its handsome exterior chimney, they closed the glass
fireplace doors and went upstairs to bed, closing their bedroom doors for
the night. They awoke several hours later to a house full of wood smoke.
No one was hurt, but the homeowner was shaken. The builder tried to fix
the problem but couldn't find the cause. Others were called in, until finally
Bryan Boe of the Oregon State University Extension Energy Program identified
the source of the problem using standard house diagnostic procedures (see
"User-Friendly Pressure Diagnostics," HE,
Sept/Oct '94, p.19).
The house was built to current Oregon building
code, but it still had problems. During the night the forced-air heating
system cycled on. Because the bedroom doors were closed, air flow to the
central return registers was reduced. This depressurized the main area
of the house, where the fireplace was located. As the fire died down, the
exterior chimney cooled down and the draft weakened, until the depressurization
was stronger than the chimney draft.
Such interaction between mechanical systems (including
exhaust devices and forced air systems) and naturally vented appliances
such as furnaces, water heaters, wood stoves, and fireplaces, occur all
over the country. The occupants don't always get off with just a scare
and a bad smell.
Depressurization can have less dramatic, but
equally important, health and comfort effects. Depressurization can speed
the entrance of radon and other soil gases into the house, and can increase
air infiltration through the building shell.
How Common Is Depressurization?
With the increasingly widespread use of sensitive
manometers (pressure gauges), we are learning more about the effects of
house depressurization on venting systems of combustion appliances. Yet
most home builders, HVAC contractors, building code officials, and even
some wood stove installers, remain blissfully unaware of the these effects.
It is generally accepted that depressurization
of -5 Pascals (Pa) or more can cause problems for natural draft appliances
(see "How Do House Air Pressures Affect Chimney Draft?").
Continuous depressurization may be caused by forced air systems or whole-house
ventilation systems. Less harmful intermittent depressurization may be
caused by exhaust fans, clothes dryers, and other exhaust devices rated
greater than about 160 cubic feet per minute (CFM).
There are no national data on the extent of depressurization
problems. But various studies are suggestive. The Bonneville Power Administration's
1994 Residential Construction Demonstration Project in Oregon, Washington,
Idaho, and Montana found that 14 of 25 new houses (56%) had combustion
appliance zone pressures worse than -5 Pa. None of the houses were specially
built to be airtight; they were all of construction similar to that of
standard "code" houses.
Depressurization problems are not limited to
new houses. Oregon's Springfield Utility Board studied 16 houses built
between 1948 and 1993, and found that 6 of the houses (37%) had depressurization
of over 5 Pa in the area of a fireplace or a wood or pellet stove. An industrial
hygiene firm inspected houses for carbon monoxide (CO) problems in Chicago,
Illinois, during the winter of 1994-95. Four of 28 houses tested (14%)
had depressurization at or worse than -5 Pa.
How Do House Air Pressures Affect Chimney Draft?
Most gas or oil furnaces, boilers, and water heaters,
as well as fireplaces and wood stoves, have natural draft venting,
which depends on warmer temperatures in the chimney to create a draft that
carries combustion by-products from the house. These systems have a draft
diverter, barometric damper, or dilution port at the base of the chimney,
which is open to the house at all times (see "Fireplaces:
Studies in Contrasts,"
HE Sept/Oct '94, p.27).
The strength of the draft depends on the temperature
difference between the chimney and outside, on air flow around the top
of the chimney, and on air pressures created inside the house. Many people
are familiar with fireplaces that have difficulty getting draft established
until the chimney is warmed up, or with wood stoves or fireplaces that
back-puff when the wind blows from certain directions. What has only recently
been recognized is the powerful interaction of fans and other mechanical
systems with chimney venting. (See "Backdrafting
Causes and Cures," HE May/June '91, p. 30.)
House air pressures are affected by natural forces
such as convection, or hot air rising inside the house (sometimes called
the stack effect-the same driving force the chimney utilizes). They can
also be influenced by mechanical systems, including exhaust fans for bathrooms,
kitchens, or clothes dryers, and ducted heating systems, such as heat pumps
or furnaces when the air handler operates. Air leaks in ducts cause unbalanced
air flows between the return side and the supply side. Leaks on the supply
side may cause depressurization where the return registers are located.
Leaks in return ducts located near a gas or oil furnace (in a basement,
for instance) will depressurize that area. In many forced air systems,
the only return registers are located in a central part of the house with
supply registers in each room. When interior doors are closed, air flows
in these duct systems can become significantly unbalanced.
If a naturally vented combustion appliance is
located in an area of depressurization, the equipment may have difficulty
establishing or maintaining draft, and combustion by-products will enter
the house rather than going up the chimney. This effect depends on the
severity of the depressurization and strength of the draft. Failure of
a chimney to establish draft within 30 seconds to one minute is called
spillage;
failure that lasts longer than 1 to 5 minutes is called
backdrafting.
Such problems can occur with wood, gas, propane, and oil systems.
Each venting system has its own threshold of
depressurization that causes backdrafting. Extensive research in Canada
has established -5 Pa as a reasonable limit for most equipment. |
Figure 1. Areas of code usage. The United States is
governed by a variety of major regional codes, local amendments, and in
some areas, no codes at all. None of the major U. S. codes requires any
house pressure testing. Mechanical codes are currently being combined into
one International Mechanical Code, providing an opportunity for a national
pressure testing requirement. |
Depressurization without Representation
While Canada and many other countries have national
building codes, the United States is governed by a mishmash of major codes,
local amendments, and in some areas, no codes at all. None of the major
U.S. codes requires testing for building depressurization.
The Uniform Building Code (UBC) and its companion
Uniform Mechanical Code (UMC), are issued by the International Conference
of Building Officials (ICBO); UMC covers HVAC and plumbing. The Southern
Building Code Congress International (SBCCI) issues the widely used Standard
Building Code (SBC). Yet another code, established by the Council of American
Building Officials (CABO) for one- and two- family homes is an attempt
to incorporate the common aspects of the ICBO's and SBCCI's codes. Efforts
are well underway to consolidate the HVAC and plumbing aspects of all three
codes into the International Mechanical Code. Manufactured housing is covered
by a national code issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Frequently these codes make reference to, and
often quote from, standards set by other nationally recognized groups,
such as the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) or the National
Fire Protection Association (NFPA), which has issued the National Fuel
Gas Code. Most states adopt one of these codes and then add state amendments
to cover what they feel is missing in the national codes.
Combustion Air
Building codes have long been concerned with providing
sufficient fresh air to support combustion. One of the earliest standards
for combustion air was issued in 1927 by the predecessor of the NFPA: "No
appliance designed to burn gas at a rate greater than an ordinary lighting
burner shall be installed in a room that is not adequately ventilated."
Specific requirements for cutting holes to connect confined spaces to areas
with "adequate infiltration" did not appear until 1950 in the National
Fuel Gas Code.[1]
Today, all U.S. codes detail procedures for determining
whether appliances require additional combustion air if located in "confined
spaces" or in buildings with "unusually tight construction," and they specify
how large the holes need to be. However, they are short on ensuring that
things will happen as intended. None of the codes give house air pressures
any more than a passing reference.
The dark soot visible on the door of this furnace
is a sign of flame roll-out-a grave symptom of severe depressurization |
For example, CABO advises that chimneys and vents
"shall be constructed and installed to develop a positive flow to convey
combustion products to the outside atmosphere"[2]
and that "air requirements for the operation of exhaust fans, kitchen ventilation
systems, clothes dryers and fireplaces shall be considered in determining
the adequacy of a space to provide combustion air."[3]
No guidance is provided to help determine whether a space is "adequate."
Ducts shall be made "substantially air tight," using sealing techniques
that include foil tape and mastic, but there is no requirement to verify
that ducts meet any specified level of tightness or that air flows are
balanced. Allowing building cavities to be used as ducts, meanwhile, virtually
guarantees duct leakage in basements, where combustion equipment is likely
to be located. CABO does not address the central issue in the Oregon mystery-unbalanced
air flows when interior doors are closed, obstructing air flow from supply
registers to return grilles. CABO does recommend supplying additional combustion
air for "unusually tight construction." However, by CABO's definition,
virtually every house constructed today is unusually tight!
The Standard Building Code specifies that "return
air may travel through the living space to the return air intake if there
are no restrictions, such as solid doors, to the air movement."[4]
Perhaps builders will offer a house without interior doors to meet code?
The code even "helpfully" provides specific CFM capacities for panned floor
joists used as ducts, making life easier for HVAC installers who still
use this flawed type of distribution.
The Uniform Mechanical Code also fails to deal
with pressure. It requires exhaust fans larger than 350 CFM to receive
make-up air from an opening a minimum of 6 inches in diameter.[5]
(According to Canadian specialist John Gulland, author of the Hearth Products
Association's Reliable Chimney Venting Training Manual, a 6-inch
passive vent would be appropriate to supply about 50 CFM.)
The heart of the problem is that these codes
address the problem of effective venting prescriptively, rather than with
a performance test. As a result, they do not address the way the air flows
through the holes once they are cut. Anyone familiar with house diagnostics
could describe a situation where adding holes to meet combustion air requirements
could make the problem worse rather than better.
Although most HVAC installers, code officials,
and builders don't know about it, one section of the 1995 CABO actually
refers to a sort of worst-case depressurization test. In Appendix H of
the National Fuel Gas Code, Step 7 of the "Recommended Procedure for Safety
Inspection" involves turning on exhaust fans and firing the appliance for
five minutes and then holding a "match, candle or smoke from a cigarette,
cigar or pipe" close to the draft hood. While the test does check sources
of intermittent depressurization, potential continuous depressurization
from the forced-air system is not tested.
Types of Venting for Combustion Appliances
vent. A passage used to carry the products
of combustion from the appliance to the outdoors.
flue. A vent that uses natural draft
to carry combustion products out of the living space.
natural draft or gravity vent. A vent
system in which the flow, or draft, is caused by the natural buoyancy of
the hot products of combustion.
forced, fan-assisted, or mechanical draft.
A vent system in which the flow of combustion products is caused by the
action of a motor-driven fan. Typically used on higher efficiency appliances
where the products of combustion are not hot enough to provide adequate
natural draft.
direct vent. An air supply and appliance
venting system in which all air for combustion is obtained from outdoors
and all gases are discharged outdoors.
vent-free or unvented. An appliance that
releases its combustion products indoors (see "Unvented Gas Space Heaters:
Drainless Sinks?" p.9).
induced draft. A furnace combustion system
designed to maintain a negative pressure where the vent connects to the
chimney, in order to control the amount of air in the combustion chamber
for greater efficiency. Sometimes confused with mechanical draft,
but induced draft does not force exhaust gases up the chimney nor
overcome depressurization.
Source: GATC Focus, May, 1996. Published
by the Gas Appliance Technology Center, a project of the Gas Research Institute. |
Canada's Standard
As a result of extensive research on depressurization
in the 1980s, the Canadian General Standards Board (CGSB) has a useful
standard to refer to-"The Spillage Test: a method to determine the potential
for pressure-induced spillage from vented, fuel-fired space heating appliances,
water heaters, and fireplaces." The standard was adopted in 1995 and resulted
from extensive research on venting by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation.
Most of the procedures described in the standard are familiar to any blower
door operator who has done a worst-case depressurization test. The standard
sets different limits for continuous and intermittent depressurization.
Unlike most worst-case tests used in the United
States, the standard requires the use of a "fireplace simulator," a two-burner
camp stove, for open fireplaces (those without glass doors). The standard
limits depressurization to a range between -5 Pa and -20 Pa, depending
on the category of equipment and associated venting system. The continuous
and intermittent limits for most naturally vented equipment are -5 Pa.
In addition to referring to the performance test,
Canada's 1995 National Building Code has two relevant prescriptive sections
about depressurization. "Protection against Depressurization" requires
that in dwellings with fuel-fired appliances vented through a chimney,
"any mechanical air exhausting device, or group of devices, operated by
a single control, with a net exhaust capacity greater than 75 liters/second
(L/s) [160 CFM] shall be provided with make-up air ... by a supply fan
rated to deliver not less than the amount by which the net exhaust rate
of the device exceeds 75 L/s ... wired so that it is activated whenever
the device is activated." The Canadian code also requires that "The return-air
system shall be designed so that negative pressure from the circulating
fan cannot: a) affect the furnace combustion air supply; nor b) draw combustion
products from joints or openings in the furnace or flue pipe."[6]
Toward a U.S. Standard
The U.S. codes could require depressurization testing.
(Most building codes already contain several performance tests; plumbing
systems and gas piping must be pressure-tested before going into service.)
A few jurisdictions have considered adopting the Canadian standard, including
Fort Collins, Colorado. It was not included in the adopted code in Fort
Collins for two reasons. First, there was little reliable data available
to assess the frequency and severity of problems. Second, there were questions
whether the Canadian "House Depressurization Limits" should be a universal
standard. Instead, Fort Collins required combustion air ducts to be labeled
as to their function, vowed to raise awareness of the issues among builders
and subcontractors through training, and began comprehensive diagnostic
testing of a sample of new homes to get local data.
There is concern that the Canadian standards
may not be applicable in the warm climates of the southern U.S. To address
this problem, the Gas Research Institute (GRI) has a multiyear research
project to develop field test procedures. David Grimsrud of the University
of Minnesota, who has been leading the GRI effort, says that such a procedure
could eventually become a standard. He has carefully monitored venting
systems to identify the factors that may cause problems. The current version
of his test procedure examines the pressure of the vent or flue with reference
to the room; worst-case depressurization tests typically measure room pressure
with reference to the outdoors.
A single consolidated International Mechanical
Code could eventually replace CABO, SBC, and UMC. Unless efforts to require
a performance test begin soon, it is unlikely that future codes will be
any smarter about depressurization than current ones. With such major changes
taking place, this is an excellent opportunity to incorporate a depressurization
testing requirement and protocol.
In the meantime, HVAC contractors, builders,
code officials, health departments, and manufacturers and installers of
large exhaust fans all need to be more aware of the hazards of depressurization.
Notes
1. Theodore Lemhof, ed. National
Fuel Gas Code Handbook, 2nd Edition. (National Fire Protection Association:
Quincy, MA, 1992), p. 123.
2. Council of American Building
Officials. CABO One and Two Family Dwelling Code. 1986 ed., Authorized
ed. (Falls Church, VA: Council of American Building Officials, 1987), section
2101.2.
3. CABO section 2001.1
4. Southern Building Code Congress
International. Standard Building Code. 1994 ed. (Birmingham, AL
: SBCCI, 1994), section 517.2
5. International Conference
of Building Officials. Uniform Mechanical Code. 1994 ed. (Whittier,
CA: International Conference of Building Officials, 1994), section 706.
6. Canadian General Standards
Board, National Building Code (Ottawa: CGSB 1995), Section 9.33.6.14.
| Back to Contents Page
|
Home Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
EREN Home Page |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|