|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
EREN Home Page |
Home Energy Magazine Online July/August 1996
trends
in energy
Saving Energy in Military Family Housing
An open chaseway for ducts and flues contributed to
increased air infiltration in this family housing unit, and exposed uninsulated
interior walls to attic temperatures. |
More than 350,000 families live in U.S. military
housing. The buildings, most of which were built 20-40 years ago, are often
energy inefficient. In addition, the government pays the utility bills,
so tenants have little incentive to conserve energy. It is not surprising,
therefore, that inspections of military family housing by Oak Ridge National
Laboratory (ORNL) have revealed great potential for energy savings. ORNL
is helping the U.S. Air Force and the U.S. Army to improve efficiency during
the military's current efforts to meet new housing needs, provide housing
quality comparable to that found in the private sector, and meet reductions
in energy consumption mandated by the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct).
The president's Executive Order 12902 mandates
that, by 2005, the military reduce its energy consumption by 30% (compared
to 1985 consumption). The armed forces will need help from the energy efficiency
profession to meet this goal.
The military's housing upgrade is taking three
forms: new construction, revitalization, and retrofit. New construction
activity is intended to provide well-built, energy-efficient, and comfortable
new housing. Revitalization typically involves redesign of an existing
house's interior, which requires extensive interior demolition and reconstruction.
Retrofit is specifically directed at weatherizing and improving the energy
efficiency of housing that is not scheduled for revitalization.
ORNL recently inspected housing at four military
installations and found deficiencies similar to those found frequently
in private housing. For instance, many homes had duct problems, and the
thermal boundaries of the houses were often undefined. Basements heated
by supply registers were not insulated, and some even opened into crawlspaces.
Floors of second-story overhangs and floors above ventilated crawlspaces
were often uninsulated.
Though measured infiltration rates were not generally
high, large attic bypasses were still found in some homes, allowing conditioned
air to escape into the attic and outside air to infiltrate into the house.
The researchers found other problems as well. Landscaping next to air conditioner
condensing units caused recirculation of hot exhaust air through the condenser,
and it also plugged the condenser coils with pollen. Hot water temperatures
were often greater than 130oF and sometimes
greater than 150oF. High-efficiency condensing
furnaces were occasionally installed in houses with low or moderate heating
loads, where they were not cost-effective. And new furnaces were often
oversized.
A supply duct was disconnected from the supply plenum
in this family housing unit, allowing conditioned air to escape into the
attic. |
Recently revitalized buildings had the same types
of construction flaws as units awaiting revitalization, though they had
received energy improvements, such as new double-pane windows and high-efficiency
heating and cooling equipment. These programs have generally failed to
fix design and construction flaws, and they sometimes build in new energy-related
problems.
To remedy these deficiencies, ORNL is developing
three guides for the Air Force and the Army, in cooperation with the National
Association of Home Builders Research Center and the Wisconsin Energy Conservation
Corporation. There will be a design guide, a retrofit program guide, and
a quality assurance guide.
The design guide has already been completed.
It helps architectural and engineering firms to choose prudent, cost-effective
energy efficiency measures for new construction or revitalization. For
revitalization projects, designers will perform site inspections of existing
housing to identify energy deficiencies.
The retrofit program guide is being developed
for Air Force and Army installation personnel. It establishes a retrofit
process similar to those used in state, utility, and other civilian weatherization
programs to select and specify appropriate energy efficiency measures.
The guide also establishes an action plan for securing funds and implementing
recommended measures.
Landscaping plants placed too close to the air conditioner
condenser in this family housing unit promoted recirculation of air through
the condenser and plugged the condenser coil with pollen. |
To ensure proper implementation of the design and
retrofit guides, ORNL is working on a quality assurance guide for installation
inspectors and contracting officers. This guide will outline review activities
to be performed by the contracting officer to ensure that the architectural
and engineering firms have thoroughly evaluated energy efficiency options.
The guide will also outline procedures that construction inspectors can
use to ensure that energy efficiency measures are properly installed.
The new push for energy efficiency in military
housing creates opportunities for civilian contractors and individuals
experienced with state-of-the-art energy auditing, retrofitting, and building.
In new construction, the Air Force and the Army will need energy specialists
to conduct performance testing on houses, to test air distribution system
leakage, and to work with builders before performance testing is done to
install energy efficiency measures. Revitalization contractors will need
experienced help to perform air sealing, duct repairs, sidewall insulation,
and space-heating system improvements. And the retrofit program guide recommends
calling in energy service providers for initial inspections and diagnostics,
analysis, and selection of retrofit measures. In addition, civilian energy
contractors may be hired to develop implementation approaches and verify
program savings.
-Mark P. Ternes and Robert L. Wendt
Mark P. Ternes and Robert L. Wendt are
research staff members with Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge,
Tennessee.
Publication of this article was
supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Building Technologies.
| Back to Contents Page
|
Home Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
EREN Home Page |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|