|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
EREN
Home Page |
Home Energy Magazine Online May/June 1996
The Changing Marketplace: Recovering the Costs for
Efficiency Services
by Paul I. Berkowitz and Sabrina L. Karl
Paul I. Berkowitz is the director of Community
Energy Efficiency Projects and Sabrina L. Karl is the Energy Smart project
manager at Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corporation.
"Customer pay" financing programs are being tested
to replace traditional subsidized energy efficiency services in a deregulated
marketplace.
Historically, residential
energy efficiency services have been subsidized by utility ratepayers and
by taxpayers through federal and state government programs. Over the last
10 years, customers have received free home energy audits, large rebates
for efficiency products and services, and in some instances, free efficiency
measures.
Now, with deregulation of the utility industry
on the horizon, along with cutbacks in federal and state spending, money
is becoming less available for these programs. As a result, providers of
residential energy services are beginning to look for ways to generate
income that can cover all or most of the costs of providing these services.
The major challenge ahead is determining how
to design programs in which customers value the services enough to pay
for them. Through a series of four community efficiency projects, Wisconsin
Energy Conservation Corporation (WECC) is striving to determine if residential
efficiency services can indeed be self-sustaining, or if they will perpetually
require some level of subsidy to exist.
Finding Out What Customers Want
WECC asked small samples of customers (focus groups)
in several communities about proposed project characteristics. The results
showed that most customers believe energy efficiency is very important,
but many lack the money for retrofits of their homes. Focus group participants
liked the idea of an energy specialist providing a home energy assessment,
installing low-cost efficiency products, and suggesting major energy efficiency
retrofits. These customers also generally agreed that $35-$50 was a reasonable
fee for these services.
The participants also liked benefits such as
contractor coordinating, financing, and quality control of contractor work.
Contractor coordinating involves helping the customer both solicit and
evaluate bids for performing recommended work. Many participants also felt
financing through loans was an attractive option as long as interest rates
were kept below 10%. "Positive cash flow" financing plans, in which the
savings from the installed measures pay for all or some of the monthly
loan payment for improvements, were especially appealing to the focus group
participants. They also responded favorably to quality control inspections
of the contractor work, since it helps assure customers the contractors
are both competent and reputable.
Pricing Project Services
It can be difficult to price project services in
a way that maximizes participation, while also providing ample profits
for the energy service providers. Customer value, benefits, ease of participation,
and positive cash flow financing all need emphasis to effectively promote
market-driven efficiency services. Residential efficiency services that
have historically been heavily subsidized or free for customers can alter
a customer's purchasing perceptions. For example, promoting compact fluorescent
lamps (CFLs) with $5 to $10 rebates off the wholesale prices may create
a perception that CFLs are only worth the amount paid. WECC has found that
customers are willing to pay a fee for a home energy assessment as long
as they receive something for their assessment fee, such as low-cost measures
(showerheads and faucet aerators), especially if major energy efficiency
potential is not identified in the home. Major measures include high-efficiency
furnaces, boilers, water heaters, and air conditioners; wall and attic
insulation; and air sealing.
WECC's residential program model includes a paid home
energy assessment, during which homeowners can learn, among other things,
about potential efficiency upgrades for equipment replacement. |
Components of an Assessment
WECC has designed four community efficiency projects
based on feedback from focus groups. Typically, WECC has used a "whole
house approach," meaning a home assessment addresses all areas of potential
energy efficiency improvements, including a home's heating and cooling
system, water heater, insulation, air leakage, lighting, and major appliances
(such as refrigerators and dryers).
The size of the assessment fee can be an important
barrier for project participation. From the focus groups, WECC found that
few people were willing to pay more than $50. One approach is to charge
a set fee for an energy assessment and more for an energy assessment plus
other WECC services such as contractor arranging, efficiency measure financing,
and quality control. In other words, home assessment pricing may be based
on a "full menu" or an "a la carte" basis depending upon the needs of the
customer.
To receive a home assessment, participants in
WECC's projects pay an initial fee of $35. For this fee, they receive:
-
A walk-through assessment to determine potential
efficiency upgrades for insulation and equipment replacement.
-
A blower door diagnostic test.
-
Installation of low-cost hot water saving devices,
such as a low-flow showerhead and a water heater wrap.
-
An assessment of water heating and dryer fuel switching
opportunities (electric to gas).
-
Demonstration of CFLs.
-
Investigation of potential energy savings from installing
a programmable thermostat.
Customers have the option to purchase CFLs or a
programmable thermostat through the project. The cost includes the wholesale
price plus a 25% mark-up.
Tapping Trade Allies
While it is not possible to provide the full menu
of project services beyond the home assessment for $35, other potential
areas of fee collection can help offset the cost. These include trade ally
contributions and margins of profit for products sold to customers. Trade
allies, such as HVAC contractors, plumbers, and insulation contractors,
can greatly benefit from a market-based energy efficiency project that
refers customers to a pool of qualified contractors. Trade allies who meet
proper insurance requirements and field installation protocols can become
major contributors both in marketing project services to customers and
in providing installation services for the efficiency measures that customers
elect to install.
Utility energy efficiency projects can help trade
allies increase their customer base and the amount of work conducted by
their firm. Since contractors receive project referrals without investing
much of their own time, a contractor fee for referrals can be justified.
A fee could be a percentage of the total dollar amount of a project. Contractors
may pay 2% of the total project cost in a new community energy efficiency
project being initiated by WECC. The higher the installation cost, the
larger the fee captured for project expenses.
A yearly contractor participation fee was also
considered by WECC in lieu of, or in combination with, the per job fee.
However, some contractors will probably be unwilling to pay a yearly participation
fee until they receive a sufficient volume of work from the project. Also,
it would be necessary to trace the projects' trade ally work trends before
determining a participation fee.
Since participation and per job fees can be justified
as a cost of the contractor's doing business, they will probably be embedded
in the price of the goods and services to customers. Customers would be
less likely to object to embedded costs than to an additional customer
fee.
Customer Mark-Up
Another way to capture project delivery costs is
to mark up the wholesale price of low-cost efficiency products that customers
purchase during the home assessment. For example, CFLs and programmable
thermostats can be sold at a "cost plus" basis, where the customer pays
a price that consists of the wholesale price plus 25%. These prices should
be comparable to local retail prices in order to have a consistent pricing
message in the marketplace. Hopefully, retailers will meet any future demand
for these products after the project is over.
Financing
As utility companies have shifted their focus away
from demand-side management to industry restructuring and competition,
financing has attained new importance. Utilities often view financing projects
more favorably than traditional rebates because loans offer several benefits.
For example, loans help customers overcome "first-cost" barriers, such
as lack of access to capital or limited disposable income. In addition,
loans do not raise the rates paid by all utility customers as do subsidized
efficiency projects. The availability of loans that are easy to access
and reasonably priced may contribute to a long-term demand for energy-efficiency
products and services that does not depend on utility resources.
Customer financing programs can provide a sustainable
way to develop energy efficiency markets. Since a customer pays the full
cost of energy efficiency improvements and loans are available for any
energy-related measures, the market is not limited to products and services
that receive a utility subsidy or rebate.
Customers will typically respond favorably to
financing that has:
-
An interest rate below 10%.
-
A loan term that allows for all or a portion of
the monthly debt to be paid by energy savings-typically 5 to 7 years.
-
Options for early loan repayment without penalty.
-
An easy and quick one-stop financing approval process
through utility bill payment history and/or credit check.
-
No minimum amount to be financed, since many residential
efficiency purchases fall below $1,500. Installment-type loans could be
offered for transactions below a set dollar amount (e.g. $1,000). For example,
a $500 purchase could be financed at roughly $20/month for 2 years.
Since loans can cause utility risk due to potential
customer default, utility risk needs to be balanced with loan underwriting
criteria. But it is important to note that the customers with the most
to gain from the project may have less disposable income and may be a higher
credit risk. Utility bill payment history can be tied to conventional creditworthiness
as the basis of approving a loan. Most past and current utility loan programs
have incurred modest loan default rates of 1.0% or less.
A loan default pool that is used to cover customer
nonpayment of loans can be embedded in the cost of loans to all customers.
For example, a loan rate of 7.0% can be increased to 7.5%. The funds collected
by the 0.5% can be used to cover default payments by customers.
Though financing can become a tool to provide
more sustainable energy efficiency activity in the marketplace, financing
by itself cannot accomplish this end. Programs must address the many barriers
to energy efficiency transactions in the residential sector. Barriers such
as the hassle of selecting technologies or contractors, timing of work
to be performed, complicated paperwork, limited customer time to secure
a loan, and risk aversion to new technology, can discourage customers from
purchasing energy-efficient products and services. In addition, many trade
allies require training on diagnostic procedures and field installation
protocols for the myriad efficiency products and services (see "Contractor
Training Key to PG&E Loan Program"). Training will improve the
quality of work performed and help ensure that savings persist for customers.
CFL Leasing
In one of WECC's community efficiency projects,
a leasing option was available for CFLs. Since CFLs have a high initial
cost in relation to their savings, a seven-year leasing program, at 6%
per year, was designed to produce more positive cash flow for customers.
Customers had the option to buy the bulbs at any time during the leasing
period, or at the end of the lease. Also, customers had the option to terminate
the lease without any obligation by returning the undamaged bulbs to the
utility within 90 days of the lease. Customers receiving an energy assessment
were receptive to the CFL leasing program. Almost one-half (42%) of these
customers leased CFLs, at an average of five bulbs each.
While leasing provides an easy and minimal-risk
opportunity for customers to obtain CFLs, WECC found that transaction costs
(paperwork, billing, etc.) are prohibitive when customers purchase only
CFLs for a seven-year term. If a program wishes to finance CFLs without
other measures, a two-year installment payment scheme is more practical
and less costly to operate. Charging customers for these purchases on their
existing utility bill will also minimize administrative costs.
Insights from WECC's Projects
All four of WECC's community energy efficiency projects,
including Park Falls' Energy Smart (see "The Energy Smart
Project"), have provided lessons for designing and implementing future
programs. Here are some of WECC's conclusions and suggestions:
-
"Customer pay" designs can work. When attractive
financing is available, customers' first-cost barriers can be effectively
addressed without resorting to rebates or heavy subsidies. Customer value,
benefits, ease of participation, and positive cash flow financing are all
important in effectively promoting unsubsidized projects.
-
To recoup project delivery costs, all sources of
potential project revenue need to be tapped, including customers and participating
contractors.
-
Financing appears to be most attractive for major
efficiency purchases. For lower-cost items, many customers will pay cash,
especially when a prompt payment discount is offered. However, more customers
are apt to participate in the project if they have the option to finance.
-
An attractive financing package cannot, however,
substitute for an easy and customer-friendly project design. Customer convenience
and mitigation of the "hassle factor" increase customer participation.
Attractive financing options may fail if participation in the project is
not convenient.
-
Utility risk due to potential customer loan default
needs to be balanced with loan underwriting criteria. A default pool can
be embedded in the cost of loans to all customers.
-
WECC's initial involvement in the contractor bidding
process was both time-consuming and expensive. WECC created customized
savings estimates and collected bids, and then hand-delivered these to
customers. A more efficient and less expensive method-using simplified
savings calculations and mailing bids to customers-is favored by WECC in
its current projects.
-
Bundling efficiency services to include electric,
natural gas, and/or water is essential to keeping project costs low and
customer benefits high. WECC tries to get as many partners as possible
involved in the projects. For instance, in a current project WECC is working
with a municipal electric utility and an investor-owned gas utility. The
partnership distributes program development and administration costs. Futhermore,
bundling efficiency services between an energy services company (ESCO)
and a utility can offer unique customer benefits (see "A
Unique Fee-Based Approach to Solar Hot Water Programs").
-
Customers with more potential for energy savings
should receive more services, but a minimum level of efficiency services
should be established for all customers.
-
Customers need a flexible and broad menu of services
(some may be non-energy such as fiber optics and telecommunications). More
customers will perceive value from the project services if they can be
tailored to an individual customer's need.
The Energy Smart Project
A two-year energy efficiency project is underway
in Park Falls, Wisconsin, a small town of 3,100 people. Sponsored by Northern
States Power Company-Wisconsin (NSPW) and designed and delivered by WECC,
the Energy Smart project is testing the potential for offering market-based
services to various communities throughout NSPW's service territory. The
project targets both the residential and commercial sectors with electricity
and natural gas efficiency measures and includes community components such
as local retail promotions of products, community events, school energy
education activities, and a community advisory committee assembled to guide
the project's delivery in the community.
What's Special About Energy Smart?
Four characteristics make Energy Smart different
from efficiency projects NSPW has offered in the past.
-
Energy Smart participants are offered positive cash
flow financing plans for efficiency improvements. No rebates whatsoever
are offered through the project.
-
Customers pay a participation fee for the home and
business assessments and customer services they receive from Energy Smart.
-
A retail mark-up of 20%-30% is applied to all products
customers purchase through Energy Smart, such as CFLs and programmable
thermostats.
-
A complete package of services is offered to participants,
from the identification of efficiency potential to contractor arranging
to quality control of technologies installed.
The "Customer Pay" Approach
WECC offers two different home assessment packages
to Park Falls residents. A Complete Assessment costs $35. The fee can be
financed, or a customer can pay immediately and receive a $5 prompt-payment
discount. The Complete Assessment includes:
-
A full walk-through assessment of potential efficiency
upgrades, such as insulation and equipment replacement.
-
A blower door diagnostic test.
-
Installation of low-cost hot water saving devices,
such as faucet aerators, low-flow showerheads, and water heater tank insulation.
-
Demonstration of CFLs in the customer's lamps and
fixtures.
-
Investigation of potential energy savings by installing
a programmable thermostat and insulation.
Customers can select various contractor services
(such as contractor selection, bid review, and quality control of contractor
work) and Energy Smart financing to install recommended measures. Customers
are not required to use contractor and financing services to receive a
home assessment.
For customers who do not have potential for major
efficiency improvements, or who are not interested in a Complete Assessment,
a Minor Assessment is offered for $18 with a prompt payment discount of
$3. The Minor Assessment includes installation of hot-water-saving measures,
a CFL demonstration, and an evaluation of the potential to install a programmable
thermostat. The price of CFLs and a programmable thermostat are not included
in the Minor Assessment fee.
When a customer signs up with Energy Smart, an
energy specialist screens the customer for efficiency potential in the
home. The energy specialist addresses the age of equipment, comfort, and
efficiency improvements already completed on the home to determine whether
to recommend a Complete or Minor Assessment. However, customers always
have the option to choose which service they desire. The telephone screening
minimizes the number of Complete Assessments that result in little or no
savings potential, which controls the overall costs of providing in-home
services.
Since the customer fees do not entirely pay for
the project's cost, the project also includes a retail mark-up for purchased
CFLs, programmable thermostats, and additional showerheads and aerators
(beyond those provided through the assessment). This mark-up results in
products being sold at retail cost. For instance, the CFLs sold through
Energy Smart range from $12 to $19. Not only are there no subsidies or
rebates for these products, but NSPW actually generates some project income
from the mark-ups. In addition, by paying retail cost for CFLs, the customer
is sold on product value, which may lead to additional purchases in the
retail marketplace.
Energy Smart Financing
NSPW commonly offers financing to its customers
for energy efficiency improvements. However, with Energy Smart the utility
has modified its financing strategy. Customers now pay the full cost for
efficiency improvements to their homes. Also, the project's financing plan
allows home energy assessment fees and costs for minor measures such as
CFLs and programmable thermostats to be financed with major energy efficiency
improvements.
The loan interest rate is about 7% and the maximum
loan period is seven years. At these low terms, customers can in many cases
achieve positive cash flow, meaning the monthly loan repayment amount is
less than the energy savings that are generated from the installed measures.
Some design elements of the financing plan have
been included for cost efficiency and ease of management by NSPW. For example,
a minimum monthly payment of $5 is imposed on all residential Energy Smart
loans to prevent small monthly payments which would result in unacceptably
high transaction costs for NSPW.
|
A WECC auditor evaluates his home energy assessment,
while discussing financing programs with the residents. Participants have
the option of financing efficiency measures through low-interest, long-term
loans. |
What Does the Future Hold?
With the current shift from a subsidized energy
efficiency structure to a competitive environment, the next generation
of residential projects needs to be innovative and sustainable in the new
marketplace. It is important for service providers to address the home
energy and comfort needs of customers, with affordable pricing for their
services and products. A pay-per-service approach allows customers to select
the products and services they want without paying for a complete package
that includes some unwanted or unnecessary services for their home. This
type of approach will hopefully prompt customers to drive the marketplace
based on perceived value, available resources, and required expertise.
Using trade allies and bundling energy efficiency
products and services with water conservation, telecommunications, energy
brokering, and other similar services will increase project demand, participation,
and revenues. An increased demand will produce a more sustainable and profitable
venture for an energy service provider such as WECC. Energy providers who
can develop financing programs that meet the needs of customers, while
making a profit, will become the successful players in this changing marketplace.
Ultimately, however, their success depends upon customer demand. The more
that customers demand the different products and services that energy service
providers offer in the marketplace, the more self-sustaining these products
and services will become.
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
EREN
Home Page |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|