|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
EREN
Home Page |
Home Energy Magazine Online January/February 1996
Creating Quality in New Construction:
A Practitioner's Perspective
by Michael Uniacke
|
|
Michael Uniacke is the owner of Residential
Energy Consulting in Prescott, Arizona, which specializes in educating
builders, architects, HVAC contractors, and consumers on quality construction.
Twenty-five years after the
first energy crisis, most newly constructed homes still lack the most basic
energy conservation details.
A visit to homes under construction
will reveal that builders are rarely utilizing the most basic energy-efficient
building and design principles. Construction supervision on a custom or
tract subdivision is an appearance- and schedule-driven process, and details
such as the quality of the trim work, gypsum board finish, paint, cabinets,
and final cleanup most often indicate a quality job to both the construction
supervisor and the consumer.
The housing industry needs to redefine a quality
job to include a high quality insulation system, airtight ducts, energy-efficient
framing, and simple solar control strategies--benefits that the home buyer
doesn't "see" until the utility bills come in.
Elements of Quality Construction
Quality work on the job site starts with a clearly
written set of specifications from the builder that includes framing and
insulation details, standards for airtightness of distribution systems,
and glazing selection. Although this does not guarantee that quality work
will be done, it at least points the crews in the right direction. Detailed
specifications also create accountability and provide an even playing field
during the bidding process.
The general contractor also needs to give subcontractors
clear information well before the job begins. For instance, a framer needs
to know details during the bidding, not during wall erection. When clear
construction details and expectations are coupled with informed supervision,
many energy-efficient elements can be incorporated into the building process
at little or no additional expense and only minor disruption of the construction
process. Other energy-efficient practices and materials do cost builders
more, but also provide large paybacks in reduced energy bills and increased
comfort.
Framing
Some carpenters are still framing buildings with
conventional channels at exterior corners and at the intersection of interior
and exterior walls. There are framing techniques that reduce the amount
of lumber used in a house and permit insulators to do a better job. Twenty-four-inch
on-center framing, three-stud corners, two-stud corners with drywall clips,
ladder-back blocking, and insulated headers are a few approaches that can
save money and significantly increase the effectiveness of the insulation
system (see
Figure 1).
Figure 1. Many contractors still use conventional
construction procedures to provide nailing surfaces for drywall at intersections.
These methods create gaps that cannot be insulated (see figures to left.)
The figures to the right illustrate ways to avoid such gaps and allow complete
insulation.
Airtight Ductwork
In the last 150 new homes I inspected, all of the
duct systems leaked, and about one in four had catastrophic duct leakage.
One local builder who specified an airtight duct system, but didn't test
it, received a complaint from the homeowner about high utility bills. The
builder then tested the ducts and found major return leaks in the crawlspace.
The lesson the builder learned was that if he doesn't test, he may not
be getting what he pays for from the contractor.
The HVAC contractor is responsible for the airtightness
of the entire air distribution system. This includes framed cavities, such
as platform return plenums and panned joists. A duct airtightness test
can often be performed prior to installing gypsum board. This allows the
installer to seal any discovered leaks. A test just before occupancy will
not allow as much sealing, but can help to maintain quality control.
The North Carolina Alternative Energy Corporation
has developed a standard target for duct leakage in new construction. The
limit is determined in cubic feet per minute at 25 Pascals test pressure
(CFM25). It can be calculated for each house by multiplying the livable
floor area by 3%. For example, a 2,000 square feet home should have no
more than 60 CFM25 of leakage in the air distribution system (2,000 x .03
= 60).
Telling someone to seal up a duct system is entirely
different from training them to do the job correctly and following up with
a test. HVAC contractors need numbers generated by a blower door or duct
tester that give them feedback on how well they are doing.
Insulation
Insulation needs to be treated like an essential
house system, not just a necessary evil. Tremendous gains can be made by
simply achieving the R-values specified on the plans. Insulation crews
need to understand that there is a large energy penalty when they leave
low spots or gaps that allow air to flow freely around the insulation.
It's easy for insulation crews to cut corners
if their work is never checked. The builder should require a certificate
of coverage from the insulation contractor and inspect each insulation
job to ensure that the insulation crew took all of the following steps: |
.
Thorough inspections are vital for quality control.
Here the author crawls over a joist to measure the depth of blown-in insulation.
|
-
Use sprayed-in insulation (wet-spray cellulose,
blown-in fiberglass blankets, or a sprayed-in foam) instead of batts in
exterior walls.
-
In the bathroom, insulate behind fiberglass tub
enclosures when these are installed against exterior walls.
-
Insulate dropped ceilings over closets or bathrooms.
-
In homes with vaulted ceilings, insulate kneewalls.
-
Insulate the attic access hatch if it is in conditioned
space.
-
]Insulate the rim joists in two-story homes.
-
Bring insulation into contact with the subfloor
in crawlspaces.
-
Use correctly sized wire batt hangers for engineered
wood I joists.
When insulation is not thoroughly inspected by the
builder, insulation contractors do not get feedback on their work and quality
often suffers. Other trades--for instance, wiring, plumbing, or roof sheathing
contractors--are usually held to a higher standard of accountability. Thus,
the actual effective R-value of installed insulation may be well below
the value specified on the plans.
A thorough inspection involves a complete visual
examination of all attic spaces, walls, and crawlspaces. Inspectors must
climb into the attic and through the crawlspace. Simply lifting the access
hatch and peering into the attic does not constitute an inspection. The
harder it is to inspect a space, the greater the likelihood of insulation
problems.
Basic Air Sealing
Air sealing efforts should focus on getting the
big leaks and controlling pressure differences in the house (see "Air
Sealing in Occupied Homes," HE Nov/Dec '95, p. 33). Pressure differences
can occur due to duct leaks and an inadequate number of returns. Sealing
the ducts and air handler, providing enough returns or pressure relief
(transfer grilles) for closed-off rooms, and correctly sizing the ducts
will help keep the house operating at a neutral pressure (see "Duct
Improvement in the Northwest," p. 21).
A blower door test provides vital information
to both the general contractor and the technicians doing the air sealing
work. The test does not take long to perform, and the feedback that the
test provides to workers is invaluable. Simple air sealing techniques,
coupled with insulation that assists in air sealing, should easily reduce
leakage in a new house to less than 3 air changes per hour at 50 Pascals
(ACH50).
Effective air sealing will only occur on a widespread
basis if the process is simplified. Subcontractors make money by doing
the same thing day in and day out. Every time a step is added to the process
there is a greater risk that something will be missed.
The construction process can be simplified by
using materials with inherent quality control, such as cellulose, blown-in
fiberglass blankets or sprayed-in foam insulation. The performance of fiberglass
batts depends too much on the quality of the installation. Batts can be
installed in such a way that their rated R-value is compromised by as much
as 30%-60%.
Wet-spray cellulose, spray foam, or alternate
wall systems combine air sealing with insulation. These systems should
be coupled with sill sealing and applying an expansive foam around windows
and plumbing and electrical penetrations in top plates (see "Urethane
Foams and Air Leakage Control," HE July/Aug '95, p. 25).
If lights are to be recessed, insulation contact
airtight (ICAT) recessed cans help to maintain an airtight shell and should
be used. Insulation can be safely blown over these recessed cans.
Sealed combustion appliances eliminate the possibility
of backdrafting, regardless of pressure imbalances in the house. Thus they
provide inherent safety for the occupants.
By specifying materials like these, the builder
can be more certain that the result will be a quality job.
This poorly installed fiberglass batt hangs off the
kneewall above a dropped ceiling. The metal pipe visible toward the top
of the photo is a vent that was never actually connected to the bathroom
fan it was intended for.
|
Ventilation
Mechanical ventilation is necessary if the new house
is to be healthy and comfortable. In mild climates, a simple, quiet, and
effective bathroom fan can cost as little as $90. In more severe climates,
heat and energy recovery ventilation systems should be used.
Solar Control
Solar control strategies should be utilized in the design process. Air
conditioning loads can be reduced dramatically if solar gain is kept out
of the house through building design and shading strategies, including
overhangs, shade screens, trees, and low-e windows with low shading coefficients. |
If a contractor performs a heating and cooling
load analysis on a house using the Air Conditioning Contractors of America's
(ACCA) Manual J, the importance of controlling
solar gain becomes very obvious. The rate of summer heat gain through an
R-19 wall in Prescott, Arizona, is 0.9 Btuh/square foot, but it is 72 Btuh/square
foot for east- and west-facing glazing. This means that 80 times more energy
flows through a square foot of glazing than through a square foot of insulated
wall area.
In climates with more heating load than cooling
load, suntempering (increasing south-facing glazing up to 7% of the floor
area) is a wonderful strategy to produce a more comfortable and energy-efficient
home. A designer simply has to know how to orient the house correctly.
Properly Sized Equipment
Most air conditioners are oversized. A properly
sized air conditioning system can help offset the cost of duct sealing
and duct airtightness tests. Not only does oversized equipment hide problems
with the building shell and ducts, but it is also less efficient due to
short cycling. The HVAC contractor should perform a Manual J thermal analysis
and use Manual D to size the ductwork (see Bigger
Is Not Better--Sizing Air Conditioners Properly, HE May/June '95, p.
19).
How Can We Make Quality Happen?
Improving the quality and efficiency of new construction
requires the cooperation of all of the people involved in the process of
building and buying a home. The elements and value of energy efficiency
need to be understood by architects, builders, contractors, subcontractors,
and consumers. A comprehensive effort at technology transfer is needed
to build an effective information loop for all of these participants. This
effort should focus on getting the basics right in all new building stock,
not on expensive and complex methods to build superefficient houses.
The way to accomplish this is through high-quality
training and education. Technology transfer needs to reach architects,
builders, contractors, home buyers, and realtors.
Colleges and Universities
Universities and community colleges should teach
building science courses, particularly for students who are entering the
building fields. Some universities are already doing this. For instance,
within Portland State University's
mechanical engineering department students can choose an emphasis on building
science. These students take courses in HVAC design, commercial and residential
building analysis, and fundamentals of building science. The courses bring
students out in the field to apply what they learn in lectures to actual
buildings.
Community colleges are another important setting
for teaching students about energy use in buildings. Many students go to
community colleges for two years to become technicians in the building
and HVAC trades. Lane Community College
in Eugene, Oregon, offers courses in building technology, which incorporate
hands-on training in diagnostic tools and skills.
Programs like these are still much too rare,
even though there is clearly a great need for them. They should be encouraged
and funded at other schools.
Utilities
Utilities have been in the energy efficiency business
for many years and can play an important role in increasing efficiency
in new construction. The problem with many utilities' traditional approach
is that the battle is often waged in offices and not in the field.
Many utilities depend too much upon prescriptive
programs, demonstration houses, and thermal analyses. Reality is what happens
in the field, not in a software run; the job site and a computer simulation
should never be confused.
Some utility rebate programs encourage investment
in high-efficiency equipment as a stand-alone program, without any performance
testing on the air distribution system. This is a prime example of the
failure of technology transfer. It leads the homeowner to think that the
equipment is all there is to it, and forces contractors to compete on that
level. But if the ducts are very leaky, an investment in an air conditioner
with a high Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio (SEER) or a furnace with a
high Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency (AFUE) will produce minimal savings.
Recently, one utility spent $800,000 on a demonstration
house, filled with expensive state-of-the-art technology. That budget could
pay for a lot of training for builders, HVAC contractors, architects, realtors,
and homeowners. Utilities should make training programs, like the Energy
Crafted Home program in New England, a larger part of their conservation
efforts in residential new construction.
Learn from the Pros
Builders and subcontractors need high-quality building
science training. Contractors should be trained in both the practices and
the principles, so they can use this information in the field to make decisions
concerning construction details and to supervise subcontractors.
We don't need to reinvent the wheel. We should
learn from programs that work. The Florida
Solar Energy Center and the North Carolina Alternative Energy Corporation's
Duct Doctoring classes have excellent programs that deal with the contractors'
reality. The Washington State Energy Office has also done some remarkable
work with building codes and training programs. The City of Austin's Green
Builder program is another extremely effective program. |
Two obvious energy-wasting problems are evident with
this new duct: a disconnection and poor insulation.
|
The most successful training programs make a
strong connection to the job site. The more time spent teaching professionals
to think independently, the greater the likelihood of success. Recently
at a construction site, I pressurized a duct system with a Duct Blaster
and then filled it with smoke from a theatrical machine. Seeing the smoke
blow through the cracks and leaks in a supposedly airtight duct system
created a paradigm shift--the duct installation crew suddenly understood
what the builder was after.
Trainers must understand the design and construction
process, and they must also empathize with their audience. Trainers should
subject their own work to performance tests. If a training is successful,
the participants should change their practices in the field.
Marketing
Consumers will pay for superior systems only if
they can see the benefits. Marketing training helps builders to feel confident
that they will get a return on their investment in quality.
More progressive builders already incorporate
insulation inspections, leakage standards and testing for duct systems,
air sealing, efficient framing details, and controlled ventilation--and
then capitalize on the fact that their competitors are deficient in these
areas.
For marketing to work, potential home buyers
need to be educated about the benefits of high quality efficient construction.
Government, utilities, nonprofit organizations, and industry groups can
all help to educate consumers.
Builders also have a role in educating consumers.
Some builders hold workshops for people who are planning to have a home
built, to inform them about what makes a quality job. A customer who is
educated about energy, health, and safety issues will be the best customer
for a quality builder. This customer will understand that a lower bid offered
by a competitor is for a different job.
Quality HVAC contractors are also beginning to
hold workshops for their clients-the builders. It is vital that participants
in different parts of the building process educate one another about the
definition of quality work.
Technology Transfer
Is the Key
The bottom line is that the people who really need
the information about quality building are often not getting it. Quality
will be built consistently into homes only when we acknowledge the difficulties
and obstacles in the construction process and begin to show more empathy
with the mainstream builder. The building science community should be championing
products that are easy to install and inherently efficient. The real challenge
is not to squeeze more efficiency out of an energy-efficient home, but
to transfer our current understanding of home performance to the mainstream
building community.
| Back to Contents Page |
Home
Energy Index |
About
Home
Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page
| Back Issues of Home Energy |
EREN
Home Page |
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|