editorial
Notes from Abroad
I just returned from three
weeks in Western Europe, Scandinavia, and Japan. Residential energy use
remains important in these countries, but in surprisingly different ways,
and for different reasons. And energy is being saved in characteristically
un-American ways.
One group of building scientists gathered to
discuss new technologies and designs to reduce space heating in very cold
climates (as in Scandinavia, Canada, and northern Japan). Curiously, the
group quickly agreed that the energy used for space heating, while still
important, was "tamed," or at least the heat loss through the envelope
was greatly reduced. The experts expressed concern that electricity used
to support more complex space-heating systems-ventilation and exhaust fans,
plus various pumps-continues to rise and now represents a significant chunk
of an "efficient" house's electricity consumption. The group noted that
space-heating energy in new, well-built homes is often the third largest
end use, after water heating and appliances. The energy used for water
heating has hardly changed during the last decade, and the number of appliances
continues to increase. Even though the meeting was supposed to focus on
space heating, the experts spent more time discussing how to reduce appliance
electricity use.
In both Europe and Japan, residential energy
conservation policies are being driven by the governments' commitments
to reduce their CO2 emissions. Japan feels that its other sectors
(industry and transportation) are already efficient, so that reductions
in CO2 emissions will have to be found in the residential buildings
sector. As a result, Japan is the first industrialized country outside
North America to establish appliance efficiency standards. Curiously, air
conditioners and televisions are the first targets. In order to give manufacturers
time to switch out of CFC-based technologies, the Japanese government has
postponed refrigerator efficiency standards.
This absence of regulatory push on refrigerators
may be regretted by the Japanese manufacturers. As an article in this issue
shows, Japan is falling behind both Europe and the United States with respect
to efficiency gains (see "United States Leads in
Refrigerator Efficiency," p. 8). Indeed, an enterprising Japanese company
recently began importing U.S. refrigerators. It sells them for less than
half the cost of a typical Japanese unit. But the clincher is that the
U.S. units are also twice as large and use up to 30% less electricity!
Europe is on its way to region-wide energy labels
for its appliances. This is no small feat; many cultural issues had to
be resolved before it could happen. Differences appeared in mundane, but
essential ways, such as energy test procedures. For example, a washing
machine's performance could not be evaluated until a test procedure was
developed and a rigorous definition of "clean" was established. It turned
out that the Germans and Italians had very different definitions of clean
clothes!
The most troubling topic never received formal
discussion, but it kept popping up: Why are the kids getting sick? And
is it the buildings' fault? Anecdotal evidence from the United States,
Europe, Scandinavia, and Japan suggests that an alarmingly high fraction
of children are developing asthmalike symptoms and allergies. Scandinavian
studies indicate that almost one-third of all children have some sort of
asthma or allergy. Japan can point to similar increases, even though outdoor
air pollution levels have fallen. The building scientists are wondering
if the indoor environment is to blame. And if buildings aren't responsible,
what is?
|