|
| Back to Contents Page |
Home Energy Index |
About Home Energy |
| Home Energy Home Page | Back Issues of Home Energy |
Home Energy Magazine Online January/February 1995
If a Spare Fridge
Is Running,
Edison Wants to Catch It |
|
In what's believed to be the largest program
of its kind, Southern
California Edison has caught and stopped 47,000 running refrigerators as
of October 1994. Edison's "Spare Refrigerator Recycling Program,"
a three-year effort launched in November 1993, is projected to recover
and recycle 177,000 spare operating refrigerators from the company's 3.7
million customers to realize more than 222 million kWh of energy savings
and a demand reduction of 33.4 MW. Edison says the typical spare, or second,
household refrigerator is 14 years old and uses twice as much energy as
a 1994 model. As a customer incentive to unplug the guzzling spare and
not replace it, Edison offers the option of one $50 U.S. Savings Bond per
unit, or a $25 cash payment per unit. In addition, the utility promotes
the fact that customers can save an average of $144 per year on their electric
bill for each unit turned in. Edison also expects to remove a total of
44,000 freezers from service.
Edison is working with Appliance Recycling Centers
of America, Inc. (ARCA) which opened a new Southern California recycling
facility in Compton to service the program. ARCA has contracted with a
number of utilities nationwide for similar recycling programs at its facilities
throughout the country.
According to Edison's Mark Martinez, instead
of randomly metering incoming refrigerators to project actual energy savings
for the recycling program, the utility is using existing data to estimate
savings. This includes test data from similar utility programs around the
country, estimates based on metering studies done by ARCA, and "book
standards and values" for different vintages available from the Association
of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM). Citing the potential drawbacks
of in-house metering, such as the cost of setting up a lab, possible damage
from transport that could affect refrigerator energy usage, and the variables
of random selection, Martinez said, "We found it would not really
be cost-effective to meter refrigerators coming in off the line."
Based on Edison program statistics and estimates as of August 1, 1994,
24,000 refrigerators and freezers had been picked up, saving customers
the cost of 30 million kWh of energy (an average of 1,250 kWh per unit),
with a demand reduction on the Edison system of 4,500 kW.
Edison kicked-off the program's promotion in
conjunction with a similar Los Angeles Department of Water and Power program
that started simultaneously. Two smaller municipal utilities in the region,
the City of Pasadena and the City of Colton, have since started recycling
programs as well. All contract with ARCA, with the utilities paying ARCA
a negotiated amount per appliance unit recycled.
Another impetus for the recycling programs is
a regulation that makes it illegal to dump large appliances in California
landfills without first removing and recovering refrigerants (specifically
CFCs) and certain other components. Edison's program is expected to recycle
27 tons of ozone-depleting CFCs, including CFC-12 in the form of refrigerant
and CFC-11 collected from refrigerator foam insulation. ARCA also recycles
metal cabinet components, and safely disposes of harmful PCBs found in
capacitors, with an overall effect of saving landfill space.
Edison conducts a separate refrigerator rebate
program providing cash rebates to customers who purchase new "high-efficiency"
or "super-efficiency" refrigerators. The scope and size of the
rebate program varies from year to year. "It relates to how much we
feel we can save during the peak load summer months and, to some degree,
to budgetary constraints," said Edison spokeswoman Mary Luthy. The
1994 program ran from July 1 to September 30, and Edison gave cash rebates
of $30, $50, or $75 depending on the efficiency level of the unit purchased,
with the $75 amount going towards "super-efficient" models to
make them more available to the utility's customers. Luthy said these models
don't use CFCs and are nearly 30% more efficient than standard efficiency
models.
To calibrate energy savings estimates for its
high-efficiency refrigerator rebate program, Edison conducted a field-metered
study of 96 of these refrigerators in households in 1992 and 1993 to compare
their actual energy usage with U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) rated energy
usage estimates. Refrigerators operating 16% to 20% more efficiently than
the appliance efficiency standards were designated "high-efficiency,"
and operating more than 20% more efficiently were designated "super-efficiency."
According to Martinez, "Our conclusion was that on an average annual
basis, the nameplate data is a good indication of actual energy usage for
Southern California." On average, high-efficiency units used about
13% less energy than listed ratings, and super-efficiency units used about
the listed amount of energy.
Ted Rieger is a freelance writer
who specializes in energy topics.
He lives in Sacramento, California.
|