|
| Back to Contents Page |Home
Energy Index |About
Home Energy |
| Home Energy Home
Page| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
Home Energy Magazine Online March/April 2000
letters
Hot Water Questions Recirculate
The article titled "Money
Down the Drain: Controlling Hot Water Recirculation Costs"
(Nov/Dec '99, p. 18) describes an energy saving method that drastically
increases energy consumption except in cases where two specific
conditions exist: (1) the domestic hot water temperature is out
of control and you don't plan to do anything about it; and (2)
the pipes are uninsulated and you don't plan to do anything about
that, either. In the study, the savings presumably come from less
heat going from the pipes into the building, but pipe insulation
would cut these losses to a minimum.
The water temperature is described in the article as ranging
between 120°F and 160°F, but 120°F is the highest
reasonable temperature for hot water. In the study, water temperature
in the buildings is controlled through mixing valves, which
mix cold water with hot water from the boilers. Mixing valves
of the $200 variety don't work well when new, and fail quickly,
while mixing valves of the $1,000 variety control water temperature
accurately when installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
The manufacturers recommend installing a return line pump that
runs continuously. If you cycle the return line pump as recommended
in the article, the mixing valve will fail and the water will
become too hot.
Henry Gifford
Gifford Fuel Saving Incorporated
New York, New York
 |
| Figure 1. A qualified contractor should
install a false loop and TACO 006 bronze self-lubricating
pump with a minimum 30 ft of properly insulated 1.25-in
to 2-in piping. |
Fredric Goldner, author of both the NYSERDA study and the Home
Energy article, responds: The focus of the study
was the energy-saving potential of hot water recirculation,
not of pipe insulation. Obviously, pipe insulation would be
greatly beneficial wherever it is missing. However, in multifamily
buildings like those that were part of this study, the pipes
(which I believe are often uninsulated) usually run within brick
walls--sometimes exterior walls that are also uninsulated--so
it is impossible to know or control whether there is any pipe
insulation. However, it is reasonable to expect a fair amount
of heat loss through the pipes.
In New York City, hot water temperature is required to be
a minimum of 120°F at the tap. In order to meet that requirement,
it must be hotter when it leaves the basement--in some cases
as much as 140°F, depending on the length of pipe it will
travel through. This is true no matter how frequently the water
is recirculated.
In my experience, even the more expensive mixing valves
do not meet long-term performance expectations, even when they
run continuously. My impression is based on research work I've
done for NYSERDA that focused on mixing valves. During this
work, my colleague and I looked at several different makes and
types of mixing valves, none of which functioned within acceptable
parameters after two years. In other cases, when monitoring
about 50 buildings for up to about a year each, as well as while
consulting on individual buildings, I've observed daily high
and low swings as well as hourly and five-minute temperature
recordings, and all too often have observed swings of up to
plus or minus 10°F -20°F allowed even by mixing valves
that claim to hold their temperature within 1°F. A colleague
of mine with equal if not more experience has observed this
problem in hundreds of other buildings.
If you are still concerned about meeting the manufacturer's
conditions, you can install a false recirculation loop with
a TACO 006 bronze self-lubricating pump and a minimum of 30
ft of properly insulated 1 1/4- to 2-inch piping (size should
be equal to the size of the mixing valve installed). This will
create continuous circulation around the mixing valve without
circulating the 130°F-140°F water around the entire
building, where it will unnecessarily lose heat and waste energy.
(See Figure 1.)
Tucson Takes Issue with Comfort
I would like to clarify some points regarding Tucson Electric
Power Company's Heating, Cooling, and Comfort Guarantee program
that may have been raised by the letter titled "Comfort
Home Flattered" in the July/Aug '99 issue (in reference to
the article "Southwest
Utility Offers Energy Cost Guarantee," Mar/Apr '99, p. 24).
Representatives from TEP did meet with people from Comfort
Home while conducting research for our program. However, TEP
felt there were several additional areas that we wanted to include
in our program; mainly the following:
- the pressure balancing in Guarantee homes necessary to
address safety issues related to backdrafting fireplaces or
combustion appliances;
- returns in each room to alleviate comfort problems that
may result when doors are closed in tight homes;
- the source of makeup air required to provide pressure balancing
when exhaust fans are in operation; and
- a fresh air ventilation system that TEP requires in every
Guarantee home to address indoor air quality issues.
These extremely important areas are integral components of TEP's
Guarantee program.
Comfort Home was an inspiration for us to take our program
to the next level. We applaud the efforts of everyone, including
Comfort Home, in taking on the challenge of building homes that
use energy more wisely.
Linda Douglas
Retail Marketing Director
Tucson Electric Power
Tucson, Arizona
| Back to Contents Page
|Home Energy Index
|AboutHome
Energy |
| Home Energy Home
Page| Back Issues of Home Energy
|
Home Energy can be reached at: contact@homeenergy.org
Home Energy magazine -- Please read our Copyright
Notice
|